Landing Gear Wheel Deceleration Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current hydraulic retract braking systems for aircraft landing gear often result in undesirable noise and vibration due to delayed deceleration and despinning of wheels during retraction, leading to potential collisions with the aircraft's well and fatigue of structural components.

Innovation Solution

A modulated wheel deceleration control system that uses wheel speed sensors to actively regulate brake pressure, reducing excessive deceleration and rebound through antiskid valve modulation, ensuring wheels stop spinning before entering the well and minimizing structural stress.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual actuation of landing gear lever is used, then pilot control is maintained, but wheel deceleration is delayed causing collisions and noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepilot controlVSAvoidwheel deceleration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control system automatically initiates wheel deceleration in advance based on detected landing gear retraction motion, eliminating the delay caused by manual pilot response. The system prepares and executes braking action before the wheels would otherwise collide with the well structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Speed

If rapid deceleration is applied to despin wheels, then wheel speed is reduced quickly, but structural components experience fatigue and rebound occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewheel deceleration rateVSAvoidstructural component durability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The braking system dynamically adjusts brake pressure based on real-time wheel speed feedback. The control algorithm modulates pressure to maintain optimal deceleration rate that prevents structural fatigue while achieving timely wheel despin, avoiding both excessive force and insufficient braking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Wheel speed sensors provide continuous feedback to the control system, which adjusts brake pressure accordingly. This closed-loop control prevents excessive deceleration forces that would cause structural fatigue and rebound, while ensuring wheels decelerate sufficiently before entering the well.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of time

If excessive brake pressure is applied, then wheels stop spinning faster, but rebound increases causing collision risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewheel despin timeVSAvoidrebound collision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies brake pressure that is sufficient but not excessive for wheel deceleration. By using feedback control to match brake pressure to actual wheel speed, the system achieves the minimum necessary braking action to prevent collisions without creating rebound problems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces the likelihood of wheel collisions with aircraft structures, decreases fatigue on landing gear components, and minimizes noise and vibration by precisely controlling wheel deceleration during retraction.

Implementation Method 1

A modulated wheel deceleration control system that uses wheel speed sensors to actively regulate brake pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWheel speed sensing:

Implementation Method 2

reducing excessive deceleration and rebound through antiskid valve modulation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure modulation: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 3

Hydraulic retract braking systems may be implemented to decelerate and/or despin the wheels of the landing gear

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction braking: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3530565B1Methods and apparatus for controlling landing gear retract braking
Publication Date: 2021.03.31 THE BOEING CO
  • EP3530565B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3530565B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3530565B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for controlling landing gear retract braking are described. A controller determines wheel speed data corresponding to a speed of a wheel of a landing gear. The controller determines wheel deceleration data corresponding to a rate of change of the wheel speed data. The controller generates a first control signal in response to the wheel deceleration data being greater than a wheel deceleration threshold. The first control signal initiates a wheel deceleration regulation process, the wheel deceleration regulation process to cycle an antiskid valve between a first valve position to release brake pressure from the wheel and a second valve position to cease releasing the brake pressure from the wheel. The controller generates a second control signal in response to the wheel speed data being less than a wheel speed threshold. The second control signal terminates the wheel deceleration regulation process.