Lane Centering Control Using Lateral Acceleration Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle lane centering control systems require time-consuming and costly calibration for each vehicle variant, typically performed using trajectory-based methods that rely on steering angle control and lookup tables, which are inefficient and labor-intensive.

Innovation Solution

A closed-loop vehicle variant independent lane centering control system utilizing vehicle sensors to measure speed, yaw rate, and lateral acceleration, with a lane centering controller determining target motor torque and adjusting for conditions like understeer or oversteer, and incorporating a PID controller for precise control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If trajectory-based calibration with lookup tables is used for lane centering control, then steering angle control can be achieved, but calibration time and costs increase significantly for each vehicle variant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelane centering controlVSAvoidcalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses lateral acceleration feedback from sensors to continuously adjust motor torque in real-time, replacing the open-loop trajectory-based calibration with closed-loop control that adapts to actual vehicle dynamics without requiring variant-specific calibration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the control parameter from steering angle (which requires calibration) to lateral acceleration (which can be directly measured and controlled), eliminating the need for trajectory-based calibration lookup tables while maintaining lane centering functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If trajectory-based calibration with lookup tables is used for lane centering control, then steering angle control can be achieved, but calibration costs increase due to labor-intensive processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelane centering controlVSAvoidcalibration process
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The closed-loop system uses real-time lateral acceleration feedback to automatically adjust motor torque, eliminating the need for manual trajectory-based calibration processes and reducing both labor requirements and calibration costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-calibration by using sensor measurements of lateral acceleration, yaw rate, and vehicle speed to automatically determine the torque characteristics curve without requiring external calibration equipment or engineer intervention for each vehicle variant

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If characteristic curve is tuned for every vehicle variant, then accurate motor torque calculation can be achieved, but system complexity and calibration requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor torque calculationVSAvoidcalibration system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a universal sensor suite (accelerometers, gyroscopes, speed sensors) that can be applied to all vehicle variants to measure lateral acceleration, yaw rate, and speed, eliminating the need for variant-specific calibration while maintaining accurate motor torque calculation across all vehicle types

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical/calibration-based approach of tuning characteristic curves for each variant with an electronic sensor-based measurement system that directly measures lateral acceleration and uses feedback control to determine motor torque, simplifying the system while maintaining precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12454263B2Vehicle variant independent lane centering control
Publication Date: 2025.10.28 ROBERT BOSCH AUTOMOTIVE STEERING
  • US12454263B2 patent drawing
  • US12454263B2 patent drawing
  • US12454263B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples provide a system for performing lane centering control of a vehicle. The system includes a set of vehicle sensors configured to measure a speed of the vehicle, measure a yaw rate of the vehicle, and measure a lateral acceleration of the vehicle. The system also includes a lane centering controller configured to receive a requested lateral acceleration, determine a target lateral acceleration based on the requested lateral acceleration and the lateral acceleration, determine a target motor torque based on the target lateral acceleration, and determine whether a control override condition is met. In response to determining that the control override condition is not met, the lane centering controller controls a motor of the vehicle according to the target motor torque. The target motor torque is a motor torque necessary to achieve the target lateral acceleration.