Laser Machining Threshold Adaptation for Reliable Cut-Break Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing laser machining technologies face challenges in accurately detecting malfunctions and miscuts due to changes in process conditions, such as soiled lenses or varying material properties, leading to incorrect detection or non-detection of cut breaks, which affects the quality and control of the machining process.

Innovation Solution

A method that defines threshold values for light-intensity-dependent and independent process variables, allowing for real-time adjustment of these values based on changes in the machining conditions, ensuring accurate detection of malfunctions and maintaining process stability by continuously updating the threshold values to reflect current conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a sensor device is calibrated under specific process conditions, then detection accuracy is improved for those conditions, but detection reliability deteriorates when process conditions change

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoiddetection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptation of threshold values based on real-time process conditions. Instead of using fixed calibration thresholds, the system continuously adjusts threshold values according to actual process parameters (laser power, feed rate, gas pressure), enabling the detection system to maintain reliability across varying conditions while preserving measurement precision for each specific condition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes a feedback loop where process variables are continuously monitored and used to adjust detection thresholds. The control device receives process data, determines appropriate threshold values, and feeds them back to the evaluation device, creating a closed-loop system that adapts to changing conditions and maintains both precision and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If separate calibration processes are performed, then sensor sensitivity is maintained, but productivity deteriorates due to additional work steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor sensitivityVSAvoidmachine running time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the calibration function with the normal operation mode. The same sensor device and evaluation algorithms are used both for production monitoring and for adapting to condition changes. This integration eliminates separate calibration work steps while maintaining sensor sensitivity through continuous adaptation during machine running time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-calibration by automatically adapting threshold values based on process conditions without requiring external calibration procedures. The control device autonomously determines appropriate thresholds based on monitored process variables, enabling the system to maintain its own sensitivity and accuracy without external intervention or separate calibration steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces malfunctions and improves the reliability of detecting cut breaks and other machining errors, maintaining process stability and preventing incorrect detection or non-detection, even under changing conditions.

Implementation Method 1

An example of a sensor device is a camera, with which light intensities are detected as spatially resolved measurement variables on a machined workpiece

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight intensity detection: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS20250010405A1Laser machining method, and laser machine tool
Publication Date: 2025.01.09 TRUMPF WERKZEUGMASCHINEN GMBH & CO KG
  • US20250010405A1 patent drawing
  • US20250010405A1 patent drawing
  • US20250010405A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A laser machining method includes defining at least one threshold value S0 with respect to a light-intensity-dependent first process variable F in at least one working range KAB or at a working point KAP, detecting a light-intensity-independent second process variable K during operation of a laser machine tool in the at least one working range KAB or at the working point KAP, determining a change in the first process variable F in the at least one working range KAB or at the working point KAP when process conditions change, and changing the at least one threshold value S0 to a second threshold value S0R according to the change of the first process variable F from a first value F0 to a second value F0R.