Always-On Lateral ADAS for Blind-Zone Lane Change Intervention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) often require operator selection to engage features like lane keep and collision avoidance, which can be tedious and lead to non-use due to distrust or environmental factors affecting sensor accuracy, and may not provide the desired steering feel.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that automatically engage ADAS features upon ignition, providing assistance only when necessary, such as when the vehicle drifts into another lane or a blind zone, using sensors to determine the presence of objects and performing minimal interventions like torque or position overlays to guide the vehicle back to its original lane, without requiring operator input.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If ADAS features require operator selection to engage, then operator control and awareness are maintained, but operator fatigue increases and system usability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveADAS engagement convenienceVSAvoidOperator time spent on selections
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically engages ADAS features based on detected unsafe conditions without requiring operator selection. The vehicle monitoring system self-evaluates sensor data, identifies unsafe conditions (such as lane drift, blind zone objects, or road departure), and activates appropriate assistance features autonomously, eliminating the need for manual operator engagement while reducing fatigue and time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If ADAS features are always on, then continuous safety monitoring is provided, but operator distrust and perception of unwanted intervention increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveContinuous safety monitoringVSAvoidOperator acceptance of system behavior
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuously engaging ADAS features, the system periodically evaluates sensor data and only activates assistance features when unsafe conditions are detected. This conditional, event-driven approach maintains continuous monitoring capability while providing intervention only when necessary, thereby ensuring reliability through ongoing assessment while improving operator acceptance by avoiding unwanted constant intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If sensor-based detection is used in all environmental conditions, then comprehensive monitoring is achieved, but measurement accuracy decreases due to dust, dirt, snow, rain, and sunlight

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSensor detection coverageVSAvoidSensor accuracy in adverse conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates multiple redundant sensors and cross-validation mechanisms to compensate for degraded sensor performance in adverse environmental conditions. By having backup detection methods and validation layers prepared in advance, the system maintains reliable operation even when individual sensors experience reduced accuracy due to dust, dirt, snow, rain, or sunlight interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Reliability

If ADAS features provide strong intervention, then collision avoidance effectiveness increases, but steering feel and operator comfort decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCollision avoidance effectivenessVSAvoidSteering feel quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial intervention only to the extent necessary to correct unsafe conditions or avoid collisions. Rather than applying maximum intervention continuously, the ADAS features provide just enough steering or braking input to maintain safety margins, allowing the operator to retain primary control and steering feel while still achieving effective collision avoidance when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12162482B2Always on lateral advanced driver-assistance system
Publication Date: 2024.12.10 STEERING SOLUTIONS IP HOLDING CORP
  • US12162482B2 patent drawing
  • US12162482B2 patent drawing
  • US12162482B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes, in response to an ignition on signal: determining, using one or more sensors, whether a host vehicle is moving from a first lane to a second lane; determining, using one or more sensors, whether an object is in at least one of a blind zone of the host vehicle and in the second lane within a threshold distance of the host vehicle; in response to a determination that an object is in at least one of the blind zone of the host vehicle and in the second lane within the threshold distance of the host vehicle, performing at least one operator assistance maneuver; and, in response to a determination that an object is not in at least one of the blind zone of the host vehicle and in the second lane within the threshold distance of the vehicle, not performing the at least one operator assistance maneuver.