Spectacle Lens Evaluation via Difference Index for Irregular Power

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for evaluating spectacle lenses fail to distinguish between regular and irregular differences in optical characteristics, which can lead to distortion and discomfort for wearers, and do not adequately consider the cylinder axis in evaluations.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that measure and evaluate the spectacle lens's power distribution, including spherical and cylindrical powers, and cylinder axis, to differentiate between regular and irregular differences by calculating a difference index through differentiation of the difference distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the lens is evaluated only at measurement point(s) according to ISO/JIS standards, then the evaluation process is simple and follows standard procedures, but the evaluation does not cover the wide region through which the wearer actually sees, leading to insufficient detection of irregular differences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation coverageVSAvoidevaluation process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lens surface is divided into multiple measurement points arranged in a grid pattern, allowing the evaluation to cover the entire lens surface rather than just a few standard points. This segmentation enables detection of local irregularities while maintaining a systematic evaluation approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation transitions from point-based measurement to surface-based measurement by introducing a two-dimensional grid of measurement points across the lens surface. This dimensional expansion allows comprehensive coverage of the lens while organizing data in a structured manner

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If the measured power distribution is directly compared with design data without differentiation, then the evaluation process is simpler, but it cannot distinguish between regular differences and irregular differences that cause distortion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedifference detection accuracyVSAvoiddata processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A difference distribution map is introduced as an intermediary representation between the measured power distribution and design data. This intermediary visualizes the spatial pattern of differences, enabling distinction between regular (systematic) and irregular (local) differences through pattern recognition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation methodology is replaced from direct numerical comparison to visual pattern analysis using difference distribution maps. This substitution enables qualitative assessment of difference types (regular vs irregular) that cannot be achieved through simple numerical thresholds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If conventional evaluation methods are used, then the evaluation follows established standards, but cylinder axis information is not adequately considered in the assessment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical characteristic assessmentVSAvoidevaluation methodology
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation treats different regions of the lens with different importance weights, particularly emphasizing regions where cylinder axis misalignment would have the greatest impact on visual quality. This local quality approach ensures that critical areas are assessed more rigorously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP2189776B1Lens evaluation method, lens evaluation device, lens manufacturing method, and lens characteristic display method
Publication Date: 2017.08.09 HOYA CORPORATION
  • EP2189776B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2189776B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2189776B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention is to provide a lens evaluation method capable of easily evaluating whether there is a difference which greatly changes locally in a lens, and evaluating the degree of the difference. According to the lens evaluation method of the present invention, first, power a distribution of a plurality of measurement point in an arbitrary direction. Next, a calculation power distribution (a design power distribution) is created. Further, a difference distribution between an actually measured power distribution, which indicates an actual power distribution, and a calculation power distribution is obtained. Further, the difference distribution is differentiated to obtain a difference index, and an evaluation is performed based on the difference index to evaluate whether there is a difference which greatly changes locally in a lens, and evaluate the degree of the difference.