LEO Surveillance Optical Network Mesh Layout

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for monitoring low Earth orbit (LEO) space debris face challenges in rapid detection, frequent re-acquisition, and maintaining precise orbital parameter updates due to limitations in sensitivity, resolution, and field of view, particularly in detecting small objects and handling geographical and meteorological constraints.

Innovation Solution

A ground-based optical surveillance system is deployed with a network of optical monitoring stations positioned according to a mesh layout optimized for 24-hour coverage and revisit duration, using wide-field passive detectors with short integration times and adaptive illumination conditions to detect and track LEO objects, ensuring 95% coverage of objects over 10 cm with precision in orbital parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If radar solutions are used for LEO surveillance, then detection sensitivity and field of view are improved, but cost of development, operation and maintenance increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidcost of development, operation and maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces radar (electromagnetic active detection) with optical detection systems that use passive light collection. This substitution maintains detection capability while dramatically reducing power consumption, infrastructure requirements, and operational costs. The optical systems use telescopes with large apertures to collect reflected sunlight from debris, achieving comparable detection sensitivity without the high costs associated with radar systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If optical systems with large aperture are used, then detection sensitivity is improved, but field of view decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidfield of view
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSArea of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the sky surveillance task into multiple segments by deploying several optical telescopes at different geographic locations. Each telescope covers a specific portion of the sky with its wide field of view, and together they provide comprehensive global coverage. This segmentation allows each individual telescope to maintain both large aperture for sensitivity and wide field of view for area coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a single-location system to a distributed multi-location network. By adding the spatial dimension of geographic distribution, the system achieves both high detection sensitivity (through large aperture telescopes at each location) and wide effective field of view (through collective coverage from multiple locations around the globe).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If ground-based optical systems are positioned in equatorial zone, then access to orbital population is improved, but temperature and humidity conditions worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to orbital populationVSAvoidtemperature and humidity conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent selects specific geographic locations that optimize the balance between orbital coverage and environmental conditions. Rather than uniformly distributing systems across the equator, it chooses high-altitude sites in tropical and subtropical regions (such as the Atacama Desert in Chile) where thin atmosphere provides excellent optical transparency and lower temperatures reduce thermal distortion, while still maintaining good access to the orbital population.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides competitive cost performance compared to radar solutions, achieving equivalent coverage and precision in LEO object detection and tracking, with a revisit duration of up to one week and precision of 100 m and 2 m/s, enabling effective collision risk assessment and avoidance maneuvers.

Implementation Method 1

their principle lies in the detection of sunlight reflected by natural or artificial objects in orbit around the Earth

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentEP2593368B1Method of realisation of a space surveillance system for surveying the near space
Publication Date: 2018.09.26 ARIANEGRP SAS
  • EP2593368B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2593368B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2593368B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for making a space watch system for the LEO areas of the Earth orbit, characterized in that said method comprises a step of providing and arraying stations of optical watch systems on the surface of the planet according to a mesh suitable for providing an efficient daily cycle of the system close to 24h and a selected revisit duration of the observed LEO area.