Level-Shifter Multi-State Voltage Indicator With Lower Circuit Area

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional multi-state indicators face challenges with complex circuit design, excessive area usage, and high power consumption due to the complexity of differential comparators, which worsen as the number of states increases.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a multi-state detector using a level shifter circuit instead of differential comparators, which eliminates the need for reference voltages and reduces static current and area requirements, utilizing MOSFET-based sub-detector modules and level shifters to generate indication signals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If differential comparators are used to implement multi-state indicators, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and area increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage state detection accuracyVSAvoidcircuit design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The voltage range is divided into multiple segments with different reference voltages (Vref1, Vref2, Vref3). Each segment is detected by a dedicated detection circuit, allowing the system to identify which voltage state (Vdd, VMH,VML, Vss) the input signal is in without requiring complex multi-level comparison logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Reference voltages (Vref1, Vref2, Vref3) are introduced as intermediary values to facilitate voltage state detection. These reference voltages serve as mediators between the input voltage and the detection circuits, enabling precise state identification through simple comparisons rather than complex differential analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If differential comparators are used to implement multi-state indicators, then measurement precision is improved, but area consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage state detection accuracyVSAvoidcircuit area
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The detection function is segmented into multiple independent detection circuits, each handling a specific voltage segment. This segmentation allows each circuit to be optimized for its specific range, reducing the overall area required compared to a single complex differential comparator that would need to handle all states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple detection circuits use identical or similar structural designs (each with its own reference voltage), allowing for standardized, compact circuit blocks that can be replicated. This copying approach reduces design complexity and enables efficient layout, minimizing total area consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If differential comparators are used to implement multi-state indicators, then measurement precision is improved, but power consumption increases due to static current

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage state detection accuracyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The detection circuits are designed to operate in a periodic or event-driven manner rather than continuously, reducing static current consumption. The circuits can be enabled only when voltage state changes are detected, allowing the system to maintain measurement precision while significantly reducing power consumption during stable states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Adaptability or versatility

If the number of states increases in multi-state indicators, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity and area increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of detectable voltage statesVSAvoidcircuit design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each additional voltage state is handled by adding a new detection circuit with its own reference voltage, creating a modular architecture. This segmentation allows the system to scale to detect more states (Vdd, VMH, VML, Vss and beyond) without increasing the complexity of individual circuit blocks, as each remains a simple, standardized unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The detection circuit design is universal and can be replicated for any number of voltage states. Each detection circuit performs the same basic function (comparing input voltage against a reference), allowing the system to maintain the same level of complexity per unit while increasing overall adaptability to detect more states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8653809B2Multi-state indicator
Publication Date: 2014.02.18 MEDIATEK INC
  • US8653809B2 patent drawing
  • US8653809B2 patent drawing
  • US8653809B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-state indicator comprises a voltage generator, for generating M voltages, with M being an integer larger than 3; and a multi-state detector, coupled to the voltage generator, for receiving M voltages, having a voltage input end for receiving an input voltage to generate an indication signal whereby the indication signal is capable of indicating the input voltage with reference to the M voltages. Unlike the prior art, a multi-state detector having level shifters according to the present invention alleviates problems of static currents and over-large areas for circuits implementing typical differential comparators.