LIDAR Object Recognition for Penetrable Obstacle Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing object recognizing devices struggle to accurately distinguish between a nearby vehicle and penetrable objects like exhaust gas or water spray, leading to potential erroneous recognition and increased collision risks due to close proximity or size enlargement.

Innovation Solution

An object recognizing device utilizing LIDAR detection point information to differentiate between vehicle sizes, track vehicles, and determine size enlargement, with additional units to identify penetrable objects by setting specific distances based on vehicle speed, acceleration, and length, allowing for appropriate recognition and collision avoidance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If LIDAR detection is used to identify objects near a vehicle, then detection capability is improved, but erroneous recognition of penetrable objects as vehicles occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidrecognition accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the object recognition process into multiple independent analysis stages: initial detection by LIDAR, size measurement, speed/acceleration analysis, and penetrable object determination. Each stage processes specific parameters separately before integrating results, allowing the system to distinguish between vehicles and penetrable objects through progressive refinement rather than single-step recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary analysis layer between LIDAR detection and final object classification. This intermediary process measures object size, calculates speed and acceleration from detection point changes, and uses these intermediate parameters to determine whether detected objects are penetrable (exhaust gas, spray) or solid vehicles, preventing direct erroneous classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Area of stationary object

If the detection range is expanded to include nearby objects, then detection coverage is improved, but false identification of penetrable objects as obstacles increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverageVSAvoididentification reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamic analysis to distinguish penetrable objects from vehicles by examining temporal changes in detection parameters. The system calculates speed and acceleration based on changes in detection point positions over time, recognizing that penetrable objects exhibit different motion characteristics compared to solid vehicles, thereby maintaining high identification reliability across expanded detection ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the analysis parameters from static object classification to dynamic parameter measurement. Instead of immediately classifying detected objects, the system measures size, speed, and acceleration parameters that change over time, using these parameter variations to reliably distinguish between penetrable objects and vehicles even when both are within the expanded detection range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If size measurement is used to differentiate objects, then classification accuracy is improved, but complexity of object analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidanalysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements partial measurement by focusing on specific size parameters (length, width, height) derived from detection point distributions rather than complete object characterization. This partial action approach provides sufficient classification accuracy for distinguishing vehicles from penetrable objects without requiring exhaustive analysis of all possible object properties, thereby limiting complexity increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Effectively recognizes penetrable objects near vehicles, preventing erroneous recognition as obstacles and reducing collision risks by generating collision avoidance courses that permit contact with penetrable objects when safe, thus enhancing safety and operational efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

from the fact that a penetrable object (an irregularly shaped object) such as fog or vapor reflects only a part of light emitted from the LIDAR

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

using a light detection and ranging (LIDAR)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLIDAR: LIDAR

Data Source

PatentUS10745004B2Object recognizing device and collision avoidance system
Publication Date: 2020.08.18 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US10745004B2 patent drawing
  • US10745004B2 patent drawing
  • US10745004B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An object recognizing device includes: an other-vehicle recognizing unit configured to recognize another vehicle traveling near the vehicle based on the detection point information of the LIDAR and to recognize a size and a traveling condition of the other vehicle; an other-vehicle tracking unit configured to track the other vehicle based on the detection point information of the LIDAR; and an enlargement determining unit configured to determine whether the size of the other vehicle which is tracked by the other vehicle tracking unit is enlarged, wherein, when the enlargement determining unit determines that the size of the other vehicle has been enlarged, detection points located near the other vehicle before being enlarged are recognized as an object other than the other vehicle.