Ligand-Macromolecule Complex Modeling via Substructure Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining the three-dimensional structural information of molecules are limited, as experimental determination of all molecular structures is unrealistic, and computational techniques struggle to accurately model complex formations between ligands and macromolecules.

Innovation Solution

A computer-based method is developed to model complex formations between query ligands and target macromolecules by identifying substructures, mapping spatial relationships, and generating 3-D structural models, which can include partial or complete atomic coordinates, allowing for the evaluation of compatibility and binding affinity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If experimental determination methods are used to obtain 3-D structural information of molecules, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to the unrealistic scope of determining all molecular structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improve3-D structural information accuracyVSAvoidnumber of molecular structures determined
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses computational techniques to generate 3-D structural models as copies of experimentally determined structures. Instead of determining every molecular structure experimentally, the system creates computational representations based on 2-D structures and known 3-D templates, enabling high-throughput structural analysis without corresponding experimental workload

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary computational modeling of 3-D structures before experimental validation. By pre-generating 3-D models from 2-D structures and comparing them against databases of known structures, the system identifies candidate molecules for experimental study, thereby reducing the overall experimental burden while maintaining structural accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If computational techniques are used to generate 3-D structural models, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to limitations in accurately modeling complex ligand-macromolecule formations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of molecular structures modeledVSAvoidaccuracy of complex formation modeling
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the ligand molecule into substructures and compares each segment against substructures in the database. This segmentation allows the system to handle complex ligand-macromolecule formations by breaking them into manageable comparative units, improving both the accuracy of spatial relationship mapping and the overall productivity of the modeling process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a database of pre-stored 3-D structural models as an intermediary between computational generation and final structural determination. This intermediary database provides reference structures that guide the computational modeling process, enhancing accuracy by anchoring predictions to experimentally validated templates while maintaining high throughput

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If substructure comparison methods are used to model ligand-macromolecule complexes, then ease of operation is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to potential loss of atomic coordinate accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of structural modeling processVSAvoidatomic coordinates precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maps spatial relationships by comparing 2-D substructure representations across different dimensional representations. By identifying corresponding atoms through 2-D substructure matching and then transferring 3-D coordinates from database entries, the system achieves accurate atomic coordinate determination while maintaining operational simplicity through automated dimensionality transformation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS7826979B2Method of modeling complex formation between a query ligan and a target molecule
Publication Date: 2010.11.02 VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INC
  • US7826979B2 patent drawing
  • US7826979B2 patent drawing
  • US7826979B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Computer-based methods for modeling complex formation between a query ligand and a target macromolecule are described herein. The methods can include, for example, providing a structural model of a query ligand and a structural model of a target macromolecule; identifying a substructure of the query ligand; identifying comparison ligands in a set of 3-D structural models that each share an identical substructure with the query ligand, wherein each 3-D structural model comprises a comparison ligand and a comparison macromolecule, and wherein the comparison macromolecule has structural features homologous to the target macromolecule; mapping spatial relationships between the substructure atoms of the query ligand and the comparison ligand such that corresponding atoms are identified; assigning atomic coordinates to the corresponding atoms of the query ligand; and generating one or more output models, each model comprising a 3-D structural model of the query ligand substructure and the target macromolecule. Related articles and apparatuses are also described.