Lithium Secondary Cell Positive Electrode Active Material

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional positive electrodes for lithium secondary cells using lithium-containing metal composite compounds are prone to particle crushing when pressed, leading to reduced electrode density and performance.

Innovation Solution

A positive electrode active material with a layered structure comprising nickel, cobalt, and manganese, formulated as Li[Lix(NiαCoβMnγMδ)1-x]O2, with specific particle and pore size distributions, and BET surface area, to prevent particle crushing during pressurization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of stationary object

If the positive electrode is pressurized to increase electrode density, then electrode density is improved, but the particles of the positive electrode active material are crushed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode densityVSAvoidparticle strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies porous materials by controlling the pore diameter of positive electrode active material particles to be 0.5 μm or more and 5 μm or less. This porous structure allows the particles to absorb pressurization energy through pore collapse rather than particle crushing, enabling electrode density improvement while maintaining particle integrity. The specific pore size range creates an optimal balance between density and mechanical strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes physical parameters by precisely controlling pore diameter (0.5-5 μm) and secondary particle diameter (5-20 μm) of the positive electrode active material. These parameter changes transform the particle structure to resist crushing during pressurization, allowing electrode density to increase from conventional levels to above 3.0 mAh/cm² without particle failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If the pore diameter is increased to prevent particle crushing, then particle strength is improved, but the electrode density may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle strengthVSAvoidelectrode density
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the pore diameter parameter to a specific range of 0.5 μm or more and 5 μm or less. This parameter change creates particles with sufficient strength to resist crushing while maintaining compact structure for high electrode density. The controlled pore size prevents both particle crushing and excessive volume expansion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite structure within particles by combining dense regions with controlled porous regions. This composite architecture provides both mechanical strength from the dense framework and volume efficiency from the optimized pore distribution, resolving the contradiction between particle strength and electrode density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS10756343B2Positive-electrode active material for lithium secondary cell, positive electrode for lithium secondary cell, and lithium secondary cell
Publication Date: 2020.08.25 SUMITOMO METAL MINING CO LTD
  • US10756343B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A positive electrode active material for a lithium secondary cell, having a layered structure and comprising at least nickel, cobalt and manganese, the positive electrode active material satisfying requirements (1), (2) and (3) below: (1) a composition represented by a composition formula: Li[Lix(NiαCoβMnγMδ)1-x]O2, wherein 0≤x≤0.10, 0.30<α≤0.34, 0.30<β≤0.34, 0.32≤γ<0.40, 0≤δ≤0.10, β<γ, δ+α+β+γ=1, M represents at least one metal selected from the group consisting of Fe, Cu, Ti, Mg, Al, W, Zn, Sn, Zr, Ga and V; (2) a secondary particle diameter of 2 μm or more and 10 μm or less; and (3) a maximum peak value in a pore diameter range of 90 nm to 150 nm in a pore diameter distribution determined by mercury porosimetry.