Loop-Shaping Controller Design Using Weighted Coprime Factorization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional process control systems face challenges in accurately modeling and controlling industrial processes due to uncertainties and disturbances, leading to suboptimal performance and stability issues.

Innovation Solution

The method involves obtaining a preliminary model of the system, constructing a weighted model using coprime factorization, and iteratively determining parameters to minimize weighted coprime uncertainty, ensuring a stability margin greater than the uncertainty, and designing a controller based on this final model.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional PID controllers are used with traditional tuning methods, then the control system is simple to implement, but the system performance and stability are suboptimal due to uncertainties and disturbances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoidcontroller design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs system identification and model construction before controller design, obtaining a preliminary model of the process system. This preliminary modeling action enables subsequent robust controller synthesis that accounts for uncertainties, improving stability without requiring complex adaptive mechanisms during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the controller design problem by changing parameters from traditional PID tuning to robust control parameters including coprime factorizations, stability margins, and weighted uncertainty bounds. This parameter transformation enables systematic handling of uncertainties while maintaining design tractability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If a high-order accurate model is used for system identification, then the model precision is improved, but the controller design and implementation becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential dynamic characteristics of the process system through system identification, separating the dominant behavior from higher-order effects. The coprime factorization methodology extracts stable and unstable components independently, enabling accurate representation of critical dynamics while simplifying the overall model structure for controller design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the model representation into coprime factors (stable and unstable parts) and further divides the frequency domain into weighted uncertainty regions. This segmentation allows targeted modeling of critical frequency ranges while simplifying less critical regions, achieving accuracy where needed without unnecessary complexity elsewhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If robust control design accounting for all uncertainties is implemented, then the stability margin is improved, but the computational burden and design time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability marginVSAvoiddesign time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies weighted uncertainty modeling that focuses computational effort on the most critical uncertainty regions rather than treating all uncertainties equally. By weighting uncertainties according to their impact on stability and performance, the design achieves robustness against critical disturbances while avoiding excessive computation on less significant uncertainties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the design approach from exhaustive uncertainty analysis to a parameterized robust control framework using stability margins and weighted norms. This parameterization transforms an intractable infinite-dimensional problem into a manageable optimization problem with finite parameters, significantly reducing design time while maintaining robustness guarantees.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8311653B2Apparatus and method for system identification and loop-shaping controller design in a process control system
Publication Date: 2012.11.13 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US8311653B2 patent drawing
  • US8311653B2 patent drawing
  • US8311653B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One method includes obtaining a preliminary model associated with a system to be controlled and constructing a weighted model using one or more weighting factors. The method also includes identifying a final model of the system using the preliminary and weighted models, where the final model has a stability margin that is greater than an uncertainty associated with the final model. The method further includes controlling the system using a controller designed based on the final model. Another method includes identifying a first model associated with a system to be controlled, performing model order reduction to identify a second model, and controlling the system using a controller designed based on the second model. Performing the model order reduction includes reducing a weighted coprime factor model uncertainty between the first and second models.