Automatic Lubrication Device Ignition Protection Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing devices for automatic lubricant provision in fire- and/or explosion-endangered environments are often costly and technically intensive due to the need for full encapsulation of components with potential ignition sources, leading to manual lubrication in many cases.

Innovation Solution

A device comprising a lubricant container, pumping device, and drive device, where components with potential ignition sources are designed with appropriate protection to prevent fires or explosions, allowing for cost-effective manufacturing and operation without full encapsulation, using conductive or dissipative materials and grounding to inhibit ignition risks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If full encapsulation is applied to components with potential ignition sources, then fire and explosion protection is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire and explosion protectionVSAvoidencapsulation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device is divided into multiple functional modules (pump unit, drive device, control device, lubricant container) that can be independently protected or left unprotected based on their ignition risk. This segmentation allows selective application of protective measures rather than full encapsulation of the entire device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different protection levels are applied to different components based on their specific ignition risks. The drive device and control device receive encapsulation protection, while the pump unit and lubricant container use simpler protective measures such as conductive materials and grounding, creating a locally optimized protection strategy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If full encapsulation is applied to components with potential ignition sources, then fire and explosion protection is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire and explosion protectionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The device architecture separates components into different protection categories, allowing manufacturers to apply costly encapsulation only where necessary (drive and control devices) while using cheaper protective measures for other components (pump unit and container).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

For components with lower ignition risk such as the pump unit and lubricant container, simpler and more cost-effective protection methods are used instead of expensive encapsulation, including conductive or dissipative materials and grounding systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of manufacture

If manual lubrication is used instead of automated devices, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidlubrication efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated lubrication system enables the system to service itself by automatically pumping and distributing lubricant to bearing units without requiring manual intervention, thereby maintaining productivity benefits while reducing protection requirements and costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables automated lubrication in hazardous environments while reducing manufacturing costs by providing necessary ignition protection only to components that pose risks, ensuring safe and efficient operation.

Implementation Method 1

The drive device is coupled to the pumping device via a force-transmission device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce transmission: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

In the embodiment conductive or dissipative materials are used, and the grounding of all components is ensured in order to inhibit the risk of ignition emanating from an electrostatic charge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 3

The lubricant container preferably includes a pressure-equalizing device, e.g., a pressure-equalizing valve, that is configured for reducing a negative pressure in the lubricant container caused by the delivery of lubricant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure equalization: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS10041627B2Automatic lubrication device
Publication Date: 2018.08.07 SKF LUBRICATION SYST GERMANY

AI summary

An automatic lubrication device includes a lubricant container configured to receive a lubricant, a lubricant delivery device for delivering the lubricant, a pump configured to pump the lubricant from the lubricant container to the lubricant delivery device, a drive configured to drive the pumping device, the drive being coupled to the pump via a force-transmission device, an internal control device for controlling the drive, and a control panel configured to enter control commands for the internal control device as an interface for an operator. Components of the automatic lubrication device that include potential electrical or non-electrical ignition sources each include at least one suitable type of protection, which makes the potential ignition sources ineffective, so that a potential fire- or explosion-risk emanating from the automatic lubrication device is eliminated when the automatic lubrication device is used in a fire- and/or explosion-endangered environment.