Magnetic Nanoparticle Assembly for 3D Cell Levitation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for 3D cell culturing using magnetic fields face challenges such as artificial substrates, complexity in fabrication, potential for cell damage, and limitations in promoting natural cellular environments, which hinder the development of regenerative medicine and tissue engineering.

Innovation Solution

A nanoparticle-based system comprising positively and negatively charged nanoparticles, one of which is magnetically responsive, combined with a support molecule to facilitate cell uptake and levitation in a magnetic field, allowing for 3D cell culturing, patterning, and imaging without leaving toxic residues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If magnetic cationic liposomes (MCL) are used to magnetize cells, then cells can be manipulated in magnetic fields, but cells are grown on the bottom of a plate rather than in true 3D culture by magnetic levitation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell manipulationVSAvoid3D culture configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts cells from the bottom-plate growth configuration and enables their levitation in magnetic fields through temporary magnetization with MCL, allowing true 3D culture configurations where cells are suspended in the culture medium rather than adhering to surfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the magnetic properties of cells temporarily by introducing MCL, which contains magnetite nanoparticles, allowing cells to respond to magnetic fields for manipulation and levitation without permanently altering cell structure or requiring permanent magnetic materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If impellers are used to agitate cells for gas exchange and prevent clumping, then cell distribution is improved, but shear stress causes cell damage and magnetic field shape control is impaired

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell distributionVSAvoidcell damage from shear stress
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces the mechanical agitation system (impellers) with a magnetic field-based manipulation system that uses magnetic forces to distribute cells and maintain suspension, eliminating shear stress from mechanical agitation while preserving cell distribution and preventing clumping

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes from mechanical agitation parameters (rotational speed, impeller design) to magnetic field parameters (field strength, gradient, configuration) for controlling cell distribution and suspension, allowing gentle manipulation without shear stress

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Shape

If microcarriers with glass bubbles are used for levitation, then buoyancy control is achieved, but fabrication complexity increases and endotoxin contamination risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelevitation capabilityVSAvoidfabrication complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the levitation capability from complex microcarrier structures with glass bubbles and achieves it directly through temporary magnetization of cells themselves using MCL, eliminating the need for artificial buoyancy devices and their associated fabrication complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses temporary magnetization with MCL that can be easily applied and removed, replacing permanent microcarrier structures with a transient magnetic state that achieves levitation without requiring complex, expensive, or endotoxin-prone materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach simplifies cell manipulation, promotes rapid cell-cell interaction, and enables the creation of complex 3D structures without specialized equipment, making it suitable for large-scale and high-throughput applications while maintaining a natural cellular environment.

Implementation Method 1

manipulation of the magnetic field and/or by magnetically bringing different cell types into contact

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

cells can be levitated and separated from the film, levitated and grown in 3D culture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic levitation: Maglev

Implementation Method 3

magnetic force to enable three-dimensional cell culture by magnetic levitation and manipulation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic force: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentEP2480343B1Materials for magnetizing cells and magnetic manipulation
Publication Date: 2017.12.20 GREINER BIO ONE NORTH AMERICA INC
  • EP2480343B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2480343B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP2480343B1 patent drawingFigure 4a~4b

AI summary

A material comprising positively and negatively charged nanoparticles, wherein one of said nanoparticles contained a magnetically responsive element, are combined with a support molecule, which is a long natural or synthetic molecule or polymer to make a magnetic nanoparticle assembly. When the magnetic nanoparticle assembly is combined with cells, it will magnetize those cells. The magnetized cells can then be washed to remove the magnetic nanoparticle assembly and the magnetized cells manipulated in a magnetic field.