Magnetic Nanoparticle Delivery for CRISPR Stem Cell Editing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current gene delivery methods, particularly those using viral vectors for CRISPR-Cas9 systems, face limitations such as low delivery efficiencies, immunogenicity, and the risk of mutagenesis, necessitating the development of more effective non-viral delivery systems for genetic editing applications.

Innovation Solution

A magnetic-assisted nanoparticle delivery system comprising a magnetic core-shell nanoparticle with a silica shell, cationic polymer layers, and encapsulated polynucleotides, which utilizes magnetofection and magnetic-activated cell sorting to enhance the intracellular delivery and editing efficiency of CRISPR-Cas9 components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If viral vectors (AAV, lentiviral) are used to deliver CRISPR-Cas9 components, then delivery specificity is improved, but delivery efficiency is limited and immunogenicity/mutagenesis risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery specificityVSAvoiddelivery efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the biological viral vector system with a magnetic nanoparticle-based physical delivery system. The nanoparticle core-shell structure with magnetic properties allows for magnetic field-guided delivery to target cells, eliminating the need for viral vectors and their associated immunogenicity and mutagenesis risks while maintaining delivery specificity through magnetic targeting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces magnetic nanoparticles as intermediary carriers between the delivery system and CRISPR-Cas9 components. These nanoparticles serve as a non-viral vector that can be magnetically guided to target cells and deliver genetic material, acting as a safe alternative to viral vectors without compromising delivery efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If non-viral delivery methods (nano-/microcarriers) are used, then immunogenicity and mutagenesis risks are reduced, but delivery efficiency remains low

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveimmunogenicityVSAvoiddelivery efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the physical and chemical parameters of the nanoparticle system, including core-shell structure composition, magnetic properties, surface charge, and size distribution, to optimize cellular uptake and intracellular delivery. These parameter optimizations significantly enhance delivery efficiency while maintaining the non-viral safety profile.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a composite nanoparticle structure consisting of a magnetic core surrounded by functional shells and coated with cationic polymers. This composite architecture combines the magnetic targeting capability with enhanced cellular interaction properties, achieving both high delivery efficiency and low immunogenicity simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Productivity

If magnetic core-shell nanoparticles with cationic polymer layers are used, then intracellular delivery efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintracellular delivery efficiencyVSAvoidnanoparticle structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the nanoparticle delivery system into distinct functional segments: a magnetic core for targeting, a shell layer for structural integrity, and cationic polymer coatings for cellular interaction. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while working together to achieve high intracellular delivery efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system significantly improves the transfection efficiency and biocompatibility of CRISPR-Cas9 systems, enabling efficient gene editing in stem cells and potentially treating genetic disorders like Rett syndrome with high accuracy and minimal toxicity.

Implementation Method 1

which utilizes magnetofection and magnetic-activated cell sorting to enhance the intracellular delivery and editing efficiency of CRISPR-Cas9 components

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetofection: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

which utilizes magnetofection and magnetic-activated cell sorting to enhance the intracellular delivery and editing efficiency of CRISPR-Cas9 components

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic-activated cell sorting: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 3

the one or more polynucleotides are associated through electrostatic interactions with the inner cationic polymer layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic interactions: Electrostatics

Data Source

PatentUS20240424139A1Magnetic-Assisted Nanoparticle Delivery and Gene Editing Systems and Methods of Use
Publication Date: 2024.12.26 RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV
  • US20240424139A1 patent drawing
  • US20240424139A1 patent drawing
  • US20240424139A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure provides a novel magnetic nanoparticle-assisted genome editing (MAGE) platform, which significantly improves transfection efficiency and biocompatibility in stem cells as well as the efficiency of CRISPR-Cas systems. Due to the great potential of CRISPR-Cas systems, the disclosed MAGE platform can be used for a host of applications in stem cell therapy for genetic disorders.