Malted Grain Fraction Separation with Low-Moisture Husk Recovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for processing malted grain residues, such as brewers' spent grain, are inefficient in obtaining high-value fractions due to high moisture content and require complex equipment or processes, generating additional waste.

Innovation Solution

A continuous multi-stage extrusion process using a slow masticating juicer with a press extractor separates a low-moisture solid fraction and a semi-solid fraction from malted grains without chemical processing, utilizing an endless screw and filtering sieve to achieve efficient fraction recovery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If chemical treatments (acid hydrolysis) are used to separate BSG components, then separation efficiency is improved, but process complexity and energy consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation efficiencyVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces chemical treatment methods (acid hydrolysis) with a mechanical separation system consisting of a grinder, centrifuge, and filter. This mechanical system achieves component separation through physical means rather than chemical reactions, thereby reducing process complexity and energy consumption while maintaining separation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and removes specific components (starch, protein, fiber) from the BSG mixture through mechanical means. The grinder breaks down the grain structure, the centrifuge separates components based on density, and the filter removes residual particles, achieving component extraction without requiring chemical treatments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Productivity

If chemical treatments are used to process BSG, then component recovery is improved, but energy consumption and waste generation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent recoveryVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes chemical energy input (acid hydrolysis) with mechanical energy input (grinding, centrifugation, filtration). This mechanical approach achieves component recovery with lower energy consumption as it avoids the high energy requirements of chemical treatments and subsequent neutralization processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a self-service separation system where the mechanical energy input is sufficient to achieve complete separation without requiring additional chemical agents. The system uses the inherent physical properties of the components (density, particle size) to achieve separation through mechanical means alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If conventional BSG processing methods are used, then processing simplicity is maintained, but fraction recovery efficiency is low and moisture content is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing simplicityVSAvoidfraction recovery efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the BSG processing into distinct functional stages: grinding (breakdown), centrifugation (separation), and filtration (purification). This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function, achieving high fraction recovery efficiency while keeping the overall process relatively simple through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a continuous processing system where BSG is continuously fed into the grinder, which continuously produces a paste that is continuously fed to the centrifuge and then to the filter. This continuous operation maintains high fraction recovery efficiency and reduces moisture content without requiring complex batch processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple processing stages are implemented to improve fraction separation, then separation quality is improved, but device complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation qualityVSAvoidnumber of equipment
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs each piece of equipment to perform multiple functions: the grinder not only breaks down the grain structure but also pre-mixes components; the centrifuge separates multiple components simultaneously based on density; the filter removes both large particles and residual fine particles. This multi-functionality achieves high separation quality with a minimal number of equipment pieces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the separation functions into a single integrated workflow where the output of one stage becomes the input of the next without requiring intermediate storage or additional equipment. The grinder output directly feeds the centrifuge, which directly feeds the filter, creating a merged processing stream that achieves high separation quality without increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process achieves high efficiency (>99%) in recovering solid and semi-solid fractions with low moisture content, enabling further treatment or separation, reducing energy consumption and waste generation.

Implementation Method 1

A continuous multi-stage extrusion process using a slow masticating juicer with a press extractor separates a low-moisture solid fraction and a semi-solid fraction from malted grains without chemical processing, utilizing an endless screw and filtering sieve

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

A continuous multi-stage extrusion process using a slow masticating juicer with a press extractor separates a low-moisture solid fraction and a semi-solid fraction from malted grains without chemical processing, utilizing an endless screw and filtering sieve

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical filtration: Filter (physical)

Data Source

PatentUS20250346842A1Fractions of malted grains and their separation process
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 UNIVERSIDAD AUTONOMA DE NUEVO LEON
  • US20250346842A1 patent drawing
  • US20250346842A1 patent drawing
  • US20250346842A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A process for separating malted grain fractions is described, which, through a single continuous processing stage with a single piece of equipment, allows the separation of a solid fraction of fragmented husk with low moisture content from the rest of its components and a semi-solid fraction that has available the smaller components originally contained in the bagasse, as well as the fractions obtained from such process.