Manipulator Controller Merging Safety and Non-Safe Logic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing manipulator control systems lack efficient and reliable monitoring mechanisms to ensure safety in unstructured environments, where human and technical failures can lead to accidents, and current safety controllers operate independently with limited interaction with non-safe controllers.

Innovation Solution

A method that automatically generates monitoring for a manipulator arrangement by specifying a virtual target process, allowing for real-time monitoring of actual processes, including speed and force limits, using a controller that can interact with both safe and non-safe systems, enabling flexible and situation-specific safety configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a safety controller operates independently with limited interaction with non-safe controllers, then safety monitoring reliability is improved, but system complexity and ease of operation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety monitoring reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the safety controller and non-safe controller into a single integrated control device. The controller executes both safe processes (safety monitoring) and non-safe processes (manipulator control) through unified control logic, eliminating the need for separate controllers and their complex communication interfaces. This integration maintains safety reliability while reducing system complexity and improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Measurement precision

If monitoring functions are specified separately by a safety controller, then safety monitoring precision is improved, but automation extent and productivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring precisionVSAvoidautomation extent
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The controller automatically generates monitoring specifications based on the process description provided by the user. Instead of requiring manual configuration of monitoring parameters, the system self-generates appropriate monitoring functions by analyzing the process steps, identified objects, and relevant safety parameters. This automation maintains high monitoring precision while significantly reducing the extent of manual configuration effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual configuration of monitoring parameters is required, then monitoring adaptability is improved, but ease of operation and productivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring adaptabilityVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of the process description to automatically determine appropriate monitoring parameters before execution. By pre-processing the process steps, identifying objects and their properties, and determining relevant safety parameters in advance, the system adapts monitoring configurations automatically without requiring manual adjustment. This maintains monitoring adaptability while dramatically improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If safety controllers use dedicated communication channels, then safety monitoring reliability is improved, but device complexity and productivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety monitoring reliabilityVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges safety monitoring and non-safe control functions into a single controller that processes all commands and monitoring requirements through unified control logic. This eliminates the need for dedicated communication channels between separate safety and non-safe controllers, reducing system complexity and improving productivity while maintaining safety reliability through integrated real-time monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP2671691A3Method and device for controlling a manipulator assembly
Publication Date: 2017.01.11 KUKA DEUT GMBH
  • EP2671691A3 patent drawing
  • EP2671691A3 patent drawing
  • EP2671691A3 patent drawing

AI summary

An inventive method for controlling a manipulator arrangement with at least one manipulator, in particular a robot, comprises the following steps: (S10) specifying a virtual target process; (S30) executing a real actual process by the manipulator arrangement based on the virtual target process; (S40) monitoring the real actual process; (S20) at least one monitoring (S; 5,6,11,12) of the real actual process (P) is specified by the control based on the virtual target process (P_v).