MEMS Accelerometer Offset Minimization via Polarity Anti-Symmetry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Microelectromechanical system (MEMS) sensors face challenges in offset stability due to undesirable forces during fabrication and operation, leading to deviations in parallel alignment between the sensor and the sensing reference plane, which affect their accuracy and suitability for various market segments.

Innovation Solution

A MEMS sensor system with a sensing reference plane and a pattern of sensing elements that share multiple axes of polarity anti-symmetry, coupled with a signal processing circuit to combine the sensing elements and provide an output proportional to external excitations, effectively reducing offset caused by deviations in alignment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional MEMS sensor design is used, then manufacturing is simpler, but offset stability deteriorates under external loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoffset stabilityVSAvoidsensing element pattern complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensing element pattern is segmented into multiple discrete sensing elements arranged in specific geometric patterns with multiple axes of polarity anti-symmetry. This segmentation allows the sensor to independently measure and compensate for offset errors in different directions, improving offset stability without requiring a complete redesign of the MEMS structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs polarity anti-symmetry in the sensing element patterns, where sensing elements are arranged in asymmetric configurations relative to the proof mass center. This asymmetric arrangement creates differential signals that are sensitive to acceleration but insensitive to offset errors, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Measurement precision

If sensing elements are added to improve offset rejection, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacceleration measurement accuracyVSAvoidsensing element pattern complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensing element patterns serve multiple functions simultaneously: they detect acceleration along the sensing axis, reject offset errors through polarity anti-symmetry, and provide structural symmetry for mechanical stability. This multi-functionality improves measurement precision without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention merges the offset rejection function with the acceleration sensing function by integrating polarity anti-symmetric patterns directly into the sensing element arrangement. This combining approach achieves both offset rejection and accurate measurement without requiring separate compensation mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If proof mass symmetry is increased, then offset rejection improves, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoffset rejectionVSAvoidproof mass symmetry tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention intentionally introduces polarity anti-symmetry in the sensing element patterns rather than requiring perfect geometric symmetry in the proof mass. This approach achieves offset rejection through electrical symmetry compensation rather than mechanical symmetry, reducing manufacturing precision requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the parameter of symmetry from geometric symmetry of the proof mass to polarity symmetry of the sensing element patterns. This parameter transformation allows offset rejection to be achieved through electrical field configuration rather than mechanical precision, relaxing manufacturing constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances offset rejection and stability of MEMS sensors, improving their performance under various external loads and enabling them to meet stringent specifications across different market segments.

Implementation Method 1

a pattern of sensing elements coupled between the sensing reference plane and the at least one proof mass to detect motion normal to the sensing reference plane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS11231441B2MEMS structure for offset minimization of out-of-plane sensing accelerometers
Publication Date: 2022.01.25 INVENSENSE INC
  • US11231441B2 patent drawing
  • US11231441B2 patent drawing
  • US11231441B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Exemplary embodiment of a tilting z-axis, out-of-plane sensing MEMS accelerometers and associated structures and configurations are described. Disclosed embodiments facilitate improved offset stabilization. Non-limiting embodiments provide exemplary MEMS structures and apparatuses characterized by one or more of having a sensing MEMS structure that is symmetric about the axis orthogonal to the springs or flexible coupling axis, a spring or flexible coupling axis that is aligned to one of the symmetry axes of the electrodes pattern, a different number of reference electrodes and sense electrodes, a reference MEMS structure having at least two symmetry axes, one which is along the axis of the springs or flexible coupling, and/or a reference structure below the spring or flexible coupling axis.