MEMS Micro-Lens Curvature Control With Reduced Optical Aberration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The manufacturing process for MEMS optical devices with reconfigurable focus is complex and costly, and the square shape of the supporting element within the cavity leads to undesirable optical aberrations due to lack of circular symmetry.

Innovation Solution

A manufacturing process that forms a MEMS optical device with a cylindrical micro-lens and supporting element, where the micro-lens is created within cavities of varying shapes, allowing for independent geometry of the main cavity and supporting elements, eliminating the need for backend operations and reducing optical aberrations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the supporting element is housed in the cavity with a square shape, then the overall dimensions are reduced, but optical aberrations increase due to lack of circular symmetry

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall dimensionsVSAvoidoptical aberrations
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention separates the cavity shape from the supporting element shape. The cavity maintains a circular cross-section to ensure optical symmetry, while the supporting element ( deposited as a separate layer) can have a square footprint. This segmentation allows each component to optimize its shape independently, resolving the contradiction between compact dimensions and optical quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention resolves the shape conflict by transitioning to a multi-layered structure where the supporting element is deposited as a separate layer on the membrane rather than being integrated within the cavity volume. This dimensional separation allows the supporting element to have a square planar footprint while the cavity maintains its circular cross-section, eliminating optical aberrations while preserving compact overall dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of manufacture

If the micro-lens is formed by depositing polymeric material on the back of the wafer within the cavity, then the micro-lens can be integrated, but the manufacturing process becomes complex and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing processVSAvoidbackend operations
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of depositing the polymeric micro-lens material on the back of the wafer within the cavity (complex backend operation), the invention inverts the approach by forming the micro-lens from the front side. The polymeric material is deposited on the front surface of the wafer, allowing the micro-lens to be formed during standard frontend processing rather than requiring complex backend operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The micro-lens is formed preliminarily during the frontend wafer processing stage rather than as a subsequent backend operation. By depositing and shaping the polymeric material on the front surface early in the manufacturing process, the lens formation is integrated into the standard CMOS fabrication flow, eliminating the need for complex backend operations and reducing overall manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process simplifies the manufacturing of MEMS optical devices, reduces costs, and minimizes optical aberrations by allowing for a more symmetrical and efficient design, enabling precise control of the micro-lens curvature for autofocus applications.

Implementation Method 1

The piezoelectric actuator 6 comprises a piezoelectric layer, made, for example, of lead zirconate titanate (PZT). The piezoelectric actuator 6 can be governed so as to deform the membrane 4, as well as the micro-lens 8, in order to vary the position of focus of the micro-lens 8 itself.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

the focusing process is controlled by the curvature that the deformation of the membrane 4, caused by the piezoelectric actuator 6, induces on a top surface 8′ of the micro-lens 8

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS12164101B2MEMS optical device comprising a lens and an actuator for controlling the curvature of the lens, and related manufacturing process
Publication Date: 2024.12.10 POLIGHT
  • US12164101B2 patent drawing
  • US12164101B2 patent drawing
  • US12164101B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A MEMS optical device including: a semiconductor body; a main cavity, which extends within the semiconductor body; a membrane suspended over the main cavity; a piezoelectric actuator, which is mechanically coupled to the membrane and can be electronically controlled so as to deform the membrane; a micro-lens, mechanically coupled to the membrane so as to undergo deformation following the deformation of the membrane; and a rigid optical element, which contacts the micro-lens and is arranged so that the micro-lens is interposed between the rigid optical element and the membrane. The micro-lens and the main cavity are arranged on opposite sides of the membrane.