MEMS Beam Stiction Prevention via Mini-Bump Array

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current MEMS beam designs suffer from stiction issues due to dielectric charging when actuators make intimate contact during repeated cycling, leading to performance degradation and beam collapse, which is exacerbated by manufacturing variations in oxide bump placement and depth.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an array of mini-bumps between the MEMS beam and actuator electrodes, which are strategically placed to prevent contact and maintain capacitance, reducing the likelihood of stiction and beam collapse by allowing the beam to collapse over the actuator electrodes while avoiding actuator contact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the MEMS beam is designed to collapse over the actuator electrodes during actuation, then the actuated capacitance is maintained, but stiction occurs due to intimate contact between the beam and electrodes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuated capacitanceVSAvoidstiction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

An array of mini-bumps is introduced as an intermediary structure between the MEMS beam and the actuator electrodes. These mini-bumps are positioned to prevent intimate contact between the beam and electrodes during actuation, thereby eliminating stiction while maintaining the collapsed beam configuration for capacitance. The mini-bumps act as spacers that allow the beam to collapse over the electrode array without direct contact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The actuator electrode structure is segmented into multiple discrete electrodes arranged in an array, with mini-bumps positioned between them. This segmentation allows the beam to collapse into a segmented configuration where it rests on the mini-bump array rather than making continuous contact with the electrodes, preventing stiction while maintaining actuated capacitance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Object-generated harmful factors

If oxide bumps are used to prevent contact between the MEMS beam and actuator electrodes, then stiction is reduced, but manufacturing variations in bump placement and depth reduce reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestictionVSAvoidbump placement and depth
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The design transitions from using oxide bumps with varying heights to using mini-bumps with uniform, controlled dimensions. The mini-bumps are engineered with consistent height and spacing parameters that are less sensitive to manufacturing variations, providing more reliable contact prevention. The uniform geometry of the mini-bump array ensures consistent performance across devices despite normal manufacturing tolerances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the MEMS beam makes intimate contact with actuator electrodes during cycling, then actuated capacitance is maintained, but performance degrades due to stiction

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveperformanceVSAvoidcycling life
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The mini-bump array serves as a mediator that enables the MEMS beam to maintain its collapsed configuration for actuated capacitance while preventing direct contact with the actuator electrodes. This intermediary structure allows repeated cycling without the stiction that would otherwise degrade performance and limit cycling life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design effectively reduces stiction and maintains actuated capacitance by ensuring the MEMS beam collapses over the actuator electrodes without making contact, thereby enhancing the reliability and performance of MEMS devices.

Implementation Method 1

Current MEMS beam designs suffer from stiction issues due to dielectric charging when actuators make intimate contact during repeated cycling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStiction: Static Friction

Implementation Method 2

stiction issues due to dielectric charging when actuators make intimate contact during repeated cycling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDielectric charging: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 3

at least one spring attached to at least one end of the MEMS beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS8973250B2Methods of manufacturing a micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS) structure
Publication Date: 2015.03.10 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US8973250B2 patent drawing
  • US8973250B2 patent drawing
  • US8973250B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Micro-Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS) structures, methods of manufacture and design structures are provided. The method of forming a MEMS structure includes forming a wiring layer on a substrate comprising actuator electrodes and a contact electrode. The method further includes forming a MEMS beam above the wiring layer. The method further includes forming at least one spring attached to at least one end of the MEMS beam. The method further includes forming an array of mini-bumps between the wiring layer and the MEMS beam.