MEMS Switch Standoff Voltage Control via Counter Electrode

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional MEMS switches are prone to self-actuation at high voltages, leading to catastrophic failure due to electrostatic forces between the movable actuator and stationary contact, which limits their voltage rating and reliability in power switching applications.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of a second fixed control electrode positioned on the opposite side of the movable actuator, known as a counter electrode, which generates an opposing actuation force to balance the self-actuation force, allowing for controlled switching states and increased standoff voltage capability by ensuring that the voltage between the movable actuator and counter electrode matches the voltage between the contact and movable actuator.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single fixed control electrode is used to actuate the movable actuator, then the switch can be controlled to close, but the electrostatic force from the power contacts causes self-actuation at high voltages leading to failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitch reliabilityVSAvoidself-actuation from electrostatic force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A second fixed control electrode (counter electrode) is positioned on the opposite side of the movable actuator to generate an opposing electrostatic force that balances the self-actuation force from the power contacts. This counter force prevents unwanted actuation while maintaining controlled switching capability through the first electrode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The solution moves from a single-sided control electrode configuration to a dual-sided configuration, placing control electrodes on both sides of the movable actuator. This dimensional change allows for balanced force generation and improved voltage withstand capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Strength

If the movable actuator is held apart from the contact by spring stiffness, then the switch remains open in de-energized state, but high voltage electrostatic force overcomes the spring force causing self-actuation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespring stiffnessVSAvoidelectrostatic force from high voltage
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The counter electrode generates an electrostatic counter force that balances the harmful electrostatic force from the power contacts, replacing the need for excessive spring stiffness to prevent self-actuation. This allows the spring to maintain its mechanical function without being overloaded.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

3Reliability

If the voltage rating of individual switches is increased for power system applications, then the overall voltage capability of the switch array improves, but self-actuation becomes more likely at higher voltages

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage rating capabilityVSAvoidself-actuation risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The counter electrode provides a balancing electrostatic force that enables the switch to withstand higher voltages without self-actuation. This force balance allows individual switches to have higher voltage ratings, which in turn enables the construction of high-voltage switch arrays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the electrical parameters by introducing a second control electrode that modifies the electrostatic force distribution. This parameter change allows the switch to operate reliably at higher voltages by balancing the electrostatic forces acting on the movable actuator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances the voltage rating of MEMS switches by preventing unwanted self-actuation, thereby improving reliability and preventing catastrophic failures in high-voltage applications, allowing for controlled conduction and non-conduction states.

Implementation Method 1

a first fixed control electrode coupled to the substrate and positioned on the first side of the movable actuator to generate a first actuation force to pull the movable actuator toward a conduction state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic force: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 2

a second fixed control electrode coupled to the substrate and positioned on the second side of the movable actuator to generate a second actuation force to pull the movable actuator toward a non-conducting state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic force: Electrostatics

Data Source

PatentEP2073238B1Mems switch with improved standoff voltage control
Publication Date: 2017.11.01 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • EP2073238B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP2073238B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5
  • EP2073238B1 patent drawingFigure 6~8

AI summary

A MEMS switch (20, 30, 40) is provided including a substrate (28), a movable actuator (22, 32, 132) coupled to the substrate (28) and having a first side and a second side, a first fixed electrode (24) coupled to the substrate (28) and positioned on the first side of the movable actuator (22, 32, 132) to generate a first actuation force to pull the movable actuator (22, 32, 132) toward a conduction state, and a second fixed electrode (27, 37, 47) coupled to the substrate (28) and positioned on the second side of the movable actuator (22, 32, 132) to generate a second actuation force to pull the movable actuator (22, 32, 132) toward a non-conducting state.