Metal-Ceramic Breaking Point Depth Modulation for Stable Fracture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for creating predetermined breaking points in metal-ceramic substrates, particularly in master cards, often result in unintentional breaking and high reject rates due to inadequate depth modulation, leading to instability during transport.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the formation of predetermined breaking points with varying depths, where a first section and a second section have different depths, modulated along the direction of the breaking point, ensuring stability and precise fracture behavior, utilizing ultrashort pulse lasers and temperature treatment to prevent thermomechanical stresses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a predetermined breaking point is formed with uniform depth in metal-ceramic substrate, then the machining process is simple, but the substrate exhibits instability during transport and high reject rates due to unintentional breaking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining process simplicityVSAvoidsubstrate stability during transport
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a depth-modulated breaking point structure where different sections have different depths. The first section has a first depth and the second section has a second depth that is greater than the first depth, creating localized variations in the breaking point structure that enhance stability during transport while maintaining controlled fracture behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If the depth of predetermined breaking point is increased to ensure stable fracture, then fracture control improves, but thermomechanical stresses increase leading to unintended breaking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracture control precisionVSAvoidthermomechanical stresses
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by applying local quality through depth modulation. The first section maintains a smaller first depth that minimizes thermomechanical stresses, while the second section has a larger second depth that ensures stable fracture control. This localized differentiation allows each section to optimize for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the breaking point into multiple sections (first section and second section) with different depth characteristics. This segmentation allows the breaking point to exhibit different functional properties in different regions, combining stress minimization with fracture control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If uniform depth is used throughout the breaking point, then the machining process is straightforward, but reject rates increase due to inadequate depth modulation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidbreaking quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by implementing depth modulation where the first section has a first depth and the second section has a second depth greater than the first depth. This localized differentiation optimizes the breaking quality by creating appropriate stress distribution and fracture control in different sections, thereby reducing reject rates while maintaining production efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the stability and reliability of metal-ceramic substrates during transport, reduces reject rates, and improves thermal shock resistance by ensuring flawless breaking and targeted weakening without unintended fractures.

Implementation Method 1

The use of ultrashort pulse lasers has proven advantageous here

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser ablation: Laser Ablation

Implementation Method 2

utilizing ultrashort pulse lasers and temperature treatment to prevent thermomechanical stresses

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal treatment: Heat Treatment

Data Source

PatentUS20240139884A1Method for processing a metal-ceramic substrate, and metal-ceramic substrate
Publication Date: 2024.05.02 ROGERS GERMANY
  • US20240139884A1 patent drawing
  • US20240139884A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for machining a metal-ceramic substrate (1), in particular for producing a predetermined breaking point, comprising:providing a metal-ceramic substrate (1) andforming a predetermined breaking point (7) in the metal-ceramic substrate (1) wherein the predetermined breaking point (7) has along a direction (V) thereof at least a first portion (A1) having a first depth (T1) and at least a second portion (A2) having a second depth (T2), wherein a second depth (T2) is realized, which is different from the first depth (T1).