Metal-Composite Joint Structure for Volatile Evacuation
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Metal to composite joints in large structures face challenges with air and volatiles trapped during fabrication, leading to porosity and increased cycle time due to multiple cure cycles required to evacuate these issues.
Innovation Solution
A metal to composite joint design that includes a dividing set of composite plies between two metal structural components, providing an escape path for volatiles, allowing them to travel interlaminarly rather than through thickness, thereby reducing porosity and cycle time.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Strength
If a step lap joint is used to join metal to composite in large structures, then the joint can connect wings to the body of the aircraft, but air and volatiles are trapped inside the laminate at the steps making evacuation difficult
Solution Approach 1:
The joint structure is segmented into multiple regions: a first region with composite plies bonded to a first metal component, a second region with composite plies bonded to a second metal component, and a third region with composite plies bonded to both metal components. This segmentation creates distinct pathways for volatile evacuation while maintaining joint strength.
Solution Approach 2:
A layer of composite plies is introduced as an intermediary between the metal components and the external environment. This intermediary layer provides controlled pathways for volatile evacuation while maintaining the structural integrity of the joint.
2Manufacturing precision
If multiple cure cycles are used to evacuate air and volatiles, then porosity can be reduced, but cycle time increases and more resources are utilized
Solution Approach 1:
The joint structure is designed with built-in volatile evacuation pathways during the initial manufacturing stage. This preliminary design allows volatiles to escape during the first cure cycle, eliminating the need for multiple cure cycles and reducing total manufacturing time.
Solution Approach 2:
The design converts the potentially harmful trapped volatiles into a beneficial evacuation flow by creating controlled pathways. The volatiles that would normally cause porosity are redirected through designated escape routes, achieving low porosity in a single cure cycle.
3Strength
If a thick large part is fabricated with metal to composite joints, then the structure can support aircraft loads, but air and volatiles inside the laminate are undesirably difficult to evacuate
Solution Approach 1:
The volatile evacuation pathways extend in the planar dimension along the joint interface rather than only through the thickness dimension. This dimensional change allows volatiles to escape laterally through the third region where composite plies are bonded to both metal components, making evacuation feasible in thick large parts.
Data Source
AI summary
Metal to composite joints and methods of forming are presented. A metal to composite joint for a platform comprises two metal structural components forming a portion of a first surface and a portion of a second surface of the metal to composite joint; and a dividing set of composite plies between the two metal structural components providing an escape path for volatiles between the two metal structural components.


