3D Metal Part Authentication Using Embedded Microstructure Marks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional anti-counterfeiting methods are unsuitable for metal components in additive manufacturing, as they increase production costs and time, and existing solutions fail to effectively authenticate metal parts due to their high melting temperatures.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for additively manufacturing three-dimensional metal articles that incorporate an anti-counterfeiting mark by varying the microstructure of the metal powder during the additive manufacturing process using electromagnetic radiation, creating a distinguishable grain structure and orientation within the article, which can be authenticated through microscopic examination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional anti-counterfeiting labeling techniques (ink or polymer labels) are used on metal components, then authentication capability is provided, but the labeling cannot withstand the high melting temperatures of metal parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication capabilityVSAvoidmelting temperature compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the physical state and composition of the marking material from organic (ink/polymer) to inorganic (metal powder with different composition or phase). By using metal powder that can withstand high temperatures and applying it through additive manufacturing, the marking maintains its integrity at temperatures that would melt traditional labeling materials, thus resolving the temperature compatibility issue while preserving authentication capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses composite material approach by incorporating metal powder with distinct microstructural characteristics into the metal component during additive manufacturing. The marking region contains a different metal powder composition or phase than the base material, creating a composite structure that provides both temperature resistance and authentication features through microstructural analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If embedded nanoparticles, stamping, coatings, adhesives, or DNA markings are used for anti-counterfeiting, then authentication capability is provided, but manufacturing cost and process time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost and time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the anti-counterfeiting marking process with the primary additive manufacturing process itself. By controlling the deposition of metal powder during the same manufacturing cycles that build the functional component, the authentication features are created simultaneously with the part geometry, eliminating separate post-processing steps and reducing both time and cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention performs preliminary action by embedding the authentication marking during the initial manufacturing process rather than adding it later. The metal powder marking is deposited and sintered along with the base component in the same build process, preventing the need for subsequent costly and time-consuming post-manufacturing operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If metal powder microstructure is varied to create anti-counterfeiting marks, then authentication capability is provided, but manufacturing process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies local quality by varying the metal powder properties (composition, phase, or particle morphology) only in specific marking regions while maintaining standard powder characteristics in the functional areas of the component. This localized modification creates distinguishable microstructural features for authentication without requiring complex process changes across the entire manufacturing system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the cost-effective and efficient integration of anti-counterfeiting marks within metal components, ensuring authenticity without altering the manufacturing process significantly and allowing for visible authentication under magnification.

Implementation Method 1

successively building up said article from a metal powder by an additive manufacturing process by scanning a selected portion of said metal powder with electromagnetic radiation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic radiation heating: Dielectric Heating

Implementation Method 2

forming an anti-counterfeiting mark in said article during said additive manufacturing process... establishing an anti-counterfeiting mark microstructure of said anti-counterfeiting mark

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelective melting and solidification: Melting

Data Source

PatentEP3053741B1Apparatus and method for manufacturing an Anti-counterfeit three-dimensional article
Publication Date: 2024.05.22 THE BOEING CO
  • EP3053741B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3053741B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3053741B1 patent drawingFigure 3~6

AI summary

An apparatus and method for manufacturing and authenticating a three-dimensional article (200) including the steps of (1) successively building up the article from a metal powder (116) by an additive manufacturing process by scanning a selected portion of the metal powder (116) with electromagnetic radiation (106), (2) forming an anti-counterfeiting mark (206) in the article during the additive manufacturing process, and (3) determining whether the article includes the anti-counterfeiting mark (206).