Metal Additive Manufacturing With Movable Cooling for Long Parts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In additive manufacturing of metal parts, particularly long substrates, there are challenges with heat dissipation leading to overheating, oxidation of reactive metals, and deformation due to temperature gradients, which increase manufacturing time, cost, and result in economic losses.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a movable cooler that dissipates heat around deposited layers to control temperature, combined with a reduced inert gas enclosure and controlled inert gas diffusion to prevent oxidation, allowing for precise temperature management and efficient deposition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If welding energy is reduced to prevent overheating, then temperature control is improved, but deposition rate decreases and manufacturing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature controlVSAvoiddeposition rate
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling system is divided into multiple independent cooling zones that can be controlled separately. Each zone can apply cooling intensity tailored to local thermal conditions, allowing efficient heat removal without requiring overall reduction of welding energy, thus maintaining deposition rate while improving temperature control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling system dynamically adjusts cooling intensity in real-time based on thermal feedback from different zones. This dynamic control allows the system to apply maximum cooling where and when needed, preventing overheating without reducing welding power globally, thereby maintaining high deposition rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Temperature

If a fixed cooled bed is used to dissipate heat, then temperature control is improved, but adaptability to different geometries is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat dissipationVSAvoidgeometry adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling system transitions from a fixed configuration to a movable multi-zone system that can be repositioned and reconfigured for different part geometries. Each cooling zone can be independently positioned and controlled, providing both effective heat dissipation and adaptability to various component shapes and sizes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Different cooling zones can be configured with different cooling intensities and characteristics tailored to local geometric requirements. This allows the system to provide optimal heat dissipation for complex geometries with varying thermal demands in different regions, rather than applying uniform cooling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Object-affected harmful factors

If large inert gas enclosures are used to prevent oxidation, then protection against oxidation is improved, but manufacturing cost and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoxidation protectionVSAvoidenclosure system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Inert gas protection is applied locally only in the immediate vicinity of the molten pool and fresh deposits where oxidation risk exists. This localized protection approach eliminates the need for large full-enclosure systems, reducing complexity and cost while maintaining effective oxidation prevention where it is most needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The inert gas protection is extracted from a global enclosure system and applied specifically to the critical zone around the deposition area. This selective application removes unnecessary enclosure structures and simplifies the system while maintaining oxidation protection effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Temperature

If waiting time between layers is increased to prevent overheating, then temperature control is improved, but manufacturing time increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverheating preventionVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling system enables continuous deposition without interruption or waiting periods. By actively removing heat during the deposition process itself, the system maintains temperature control while keeping the deposition operation continuous, eliminating the time losses associated with waiting between layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

Cooling action is applied in advance and concurrently with deposition rather than after overheating occurs. This preliminary and simultaneous cooling prevents temperature buildup before it becomes problematic, allowing continuous operation without the need for interruptive waiting periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method reduces manufacturing time and costs, prevents overheating and oxidation, and minimizes deformations, enabling the production of complex, long metal parts with improved thermal control and reduced economic impact.

Implementation Method 1

cooling, using a cooler that is movable relative to the substrate, a cooling zone located at least around the last layer deposited

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

dissipate heat around deposited layers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 3

oxidation of the molten metal... carry out the metal additive manufacturing in an environment free from oxygen... controlled inert gas diffusion to prevent oxidation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation prevention through inert gas atmosphere: Oxidation

Implementation Method 4

creation of deformations linked to a significant temperature gradient between the layer n−1 previously deposited and the layer n being deposited... local relaxation of stresses at high temperatures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal stress and deformation: Temperature Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS20240189911A1Method for the additive manufacturing of a metal part
Publication Date: 2024.06.13 INST DE RECH TECHQUE JULES VERNE
  • US20240189911A1 patent drawing
  • US20240189911A1 patent drawing
  • US20240189911A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for the additive manufacturing of a metal part on a substrate, by adding at least one molten metal layer by layer. The method includes the following steps: a) step a: depositing the molten metal layer by layer, b) step b: simultaneously with step a), cooling, by means of a cooler that is mobile relative to the substrate, a cooling zone located at least around the layer deposited immediately prior to the layer currently being deposited.