Metal Surface Roughening via Dual-Mold Undercut Formation

Solution Overview

Problem

Current surface roughening methods for metals, such as laser processing and shot blasting, are inefficient and costly, and methods like those in JP 2011-005549 A require excessive processing time to form undercuts, which are necessary for enhanced bonding strength.

Innovation Solution

A surface roughening apparatus and method using a first mold with angular protrusions to form recesses and a second mold with lower, sharper protrusions to deform these recesses into undercut shapes, allowing for simultaneous formation of multiple undercut portions efficiently.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If laser processing is used to roughen the metal surface, then bonding strength is improved, but processing time and equipment cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional mechanical methods (shot blasting, etching) and expensive laser processing with a specialized mold pressing system. The mold with protrusions directly presses into the metal surface to form recesses with undercuts, achieving both roughening and undercut formation in a single mechanical operation, thus eliminating the need for time-consuming laser processing while maintaining bonding strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The mold pressing operation performs preliminary action by simultaneously forming both the recesses and the undercut shapes in one step. The protrusions on the mold are designed with specific geometry (larger base area than tip area) to create the undercut profile directly during pressing, eliminating the need for subsequent processing steps that would otherwise be required to create the undercut structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If conventional mechanical methods (etching, shot blasting) are used to roughen the metal surface, then processing time is reduced, but the depth of convex and concave portions is insufficient for adequate bonding strength

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional mechanical methods (shot blasting, etching) with a specialized mold pressing system that uses controlled plastic deformation. The mold protrusions press into the metal surface to form deeper recesses with undercut profiles, achieving both efficient processing and sufficient depth for strong bonding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the mold protrusions (base area larger than tip area) to control the depth and profile of the formed recesses. By adjusting the pressing force and mold geometry, the system achieves optimal recess depth and undercut shape that provide adequate bonding strength while maintaining high processing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If ridges are plastically deformed continuously by roller rotation to form undercuts, then bonding strength is improved, but processing time increases due to sequential deformation at single locations

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the deformation function across multiple protrusions on the mold. Each protrusion is responsible for forming a recess with undercut at a specific location, allowing simultaneous formation of multiple undercuts across the entire surface in one pressing operation, rather than sequential deformation by a single roller

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from one-dimensional sequential deformation (roller moving along the surface) to two-dimensional parallel deformation (multiple protrusions pressing simultaneously across the surface). This dimensional change allows all undercuts to be formed at the same time, dramatically increasing processing speed while maintaining the undercut structure needed for bonding strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces processing time and cost while ensuring uniform undercut shapes, thereby enhancing bonding strength between metal and resin.

Implementation Method 1

press the first mold in the metal stock in a state where the surface of the first mold faces a first surface of the metal stock such that recesses are formed by the plurality of first protrusions in the metal stock

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Implementation Method 2

press the plurality of second protrusions into the recesses formed by the plurality of first protrusions such that each of the recesses formed by the plurality of first protrusions in the metal stock is deformed into an undercut shape

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3117953B1Surface roughening apparatus for metal stock and surface roughening method for metal stock
Publication Date: 2018.01.03
  • EP3117953B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3117953B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3117953B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A surface roughening apparatus (1) includes a first mold (10) and a second mold (20). The first mold (10) has a plurality of protrusions (12) each formed in an angular shape. The first mold 10 presses a metallic material (50) to form recesses (52) corresponding to the respective shapes of the protrusions (12) in a surface (50a) of the metallic material (50). The second mold (20) has a plurality of protrusions (22) each formed in an angular shape. After the first mold (10) presses the metallic material (50), the second mold (20) presses the metallic material (50), thereby deforming each recess (52) into an undercut shape. A height of each protrusion (12) is greater than that of each protrusion (22). A tip angle of each protrusion (12) is smaller than that of each protrusion (22).