Micromechanical Sensor Thermal Gradient Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Micromechanical acceleration sensors experience zero point errors due to temperature gradients, causing net movement of gas molecules and interaction with the seismic mass, leading to sensitivity issues and offset errors.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of harmonizing means, such as structuring elements, thermal insulators/conductors, and thermal coupling elements, to homogenize the temperature gradient field within the sensor cavity, reducing thermal effects and ensuring deflection is solely due to mechanical inertial forces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the sensor operates in thermally complex environments, then the sensor can be used in practical applications (smartphones, wearable devices, engine compartments), but temperature gradients cause zero point errors and reduced measurement precision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication rangeVSAvoidzero point error
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The cap element is provided with different distance sections at different locations, creating local variations in the gap between the cap element and seismic mass. This local structuring compensates for temperature gradient effects by creating asymmetric fluid-dynamic characteristics that counterbalance the thermal-induced forces on the seismic mass, thereby maintaining measurement precision in thermally complex environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If the cavity is filled with gas at defined pressure, then the seismic mass can move freely, but temperature gradients cause net movement of gas molecules that interact with the seismic mass and create offset errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseismic mass mobilityVSAvoidoffset error
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

By providing different distance sections between the cap element and seismic mass at different locations, the patent creates localized fluid-dynamic characteristics that compensate for the net gas molecule movement caused by temperature gradients. This local structuring ensures that gas pressure forces on the seismic mass are balanced, preventing offset errors while maintaining free movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If conventional cap wafer modifications are used for anchor points and torque compensation, then structural requirements are met, but fluid-dynamic symmetry is not achieved and thermal effects remain unmitigated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidthermal sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cap element incorporates different distance sections that create specific fluid-dynamic characteristics. This local structuring goes beyond conventional anchor point modifications to achieve fluid-dynamic symmetry, compensating for thermal effects on the seismic mass and reducing thermal sensitivity while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful effect of temperature gradients into a beneficial compensation mechanism. By structuring the cap element with different distance sections, the asymmetric thermal expansion and gas molecule movement are harnessed to create compensating forces that balance the net thermal effects on the seismic mass, turning thermal interference into a self-correcting system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces the sensitivity of the sensor to thermal effects, minimizing unwanted changes in sensor parameters and offset errors, thereby improving the accuracy and reliability of the micromechanical sensor.

Implementation Method 1

harmonizing means that are designed to provide a homogenization of a temperature gradient field in the cavity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

a net movement of the gas molecules in the cavity that occurs both in the case of time-dependent and also stationary temperature gradients

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal convection: Convection

Implementation Method 3

From this temperature gradient there results a net movement of the gas molecules in the cavity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermophoresis: Thermophoresis

Data Source

PatentUS11485630B2Micromechanical sensor
Publication Date: 2022.11.01 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US11485630B2 patent drawing
  • US11485630B2 patent drawing
  • US11485630B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A micromechanical sensor. The sensor includes a substrate, a cap element situated on the substrate, at least one seismic mass that is deflectable orthogonal to the cap element, an internal pressure that is lower by a defined amount relative to the surrounding environment prevailing inside a cavity, and a compensating element designed to provide a homogenization of a temperature gradient field in the cavity during operation of the micromechanical sensor.