Micromechanical Component Stop Area Design for Drop Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Micromechanical components lack robustness and drop resistance, leading to potential damage from collisions and drops, limiting their versatility and reliability in applications.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating convexly or concavely shaped stop areas on elastically bendable subsections of the stop support and frame, which absorb kinetic energy and distribute force, reducing the risk of breakage and enhancing the component's ability to withstand impacts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional micromechanical components are used without stop areas, then the structure remains simple, but the components lack robustness and drop resistance, leading to potential damage from collisions and drops

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobustness and drop resistanceVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The stop areas are pre-formed on the support structure before the micromechanical component is assembled. These stop areas are positioned to limit relative movement in advance, preventing excessive displacement during drops or collisions before damage can occur to other components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The stop areas act as cushioning elements that are already in place to absorb and distribute impact forces during unexpected events like drops or collisions. The convex shape of the stop areas helps distribute the impact force over a larger area, preventing concentrated stress points that could lead to component failure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Reliability

If stop areas are added to limit relative movement, then drop robustness increases, but the manufacturing process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrop robustnessVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The stop areas are integrated directly into the support structure as a unified component rather than being separate parts that require additional assembly steps. This merging of functions (structural support + impact limitation) simplifies the overall manufacturing process while maintaining the protective function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The stop areas are formed with specific geometric parameters (convex shape, predetermined positions) that optimize their ability to limit relative movement and distribute impact forces. These parameter changes are achieved through standard microfabrication techniques, maintaining ease of manufacture while improving drop robustness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If the micromechanical component is designed for high robustness, then it can withstand greater force impacts and drop heights, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The stop areas are formed with convex (curved) surfaces rather than sharp edges or flat surfaces. This curvature allows impact forces to be distributed over a larger contact area during drops or collisions, increasing impact resistance while adding minimal structural complexity. The curved geometry naturally redirects impact forces away from critical components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design significantly increases the robustness and drop resistance of micromechanical components, allowing them to withstand greater forces and heights, thus enabling more versatile use in various applications, including actuators and sensors.

Implementation Method 1

A contact of the coil brace with the at least one first stop area thus results in an elastic deformation of the at least one associated elastically bendable subarea of the stop support, which makes it possible to absorb kinetic energy (drop energy)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10696542B2Micromechanical component and method for producing a micromechanical component
Publication Date: 2020.06.30 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US10696542B2 patent drawing
  • US10696542B2 patent drawing
  • US10696542B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A micromechanical component including a mounting support, a coil winding retained by a coil brace, and an adjustable part, the coil brace and the adjustable part being connected to each other and via at least one spring element with the mounting support in such a way that the adjustable part is adjustable relative to the mounting support about at least one axis of rotation, and a stop support being fixedly disposed or developed on the mounting support and being at least partially framed by the coil brace, which stop support has at least one first stop area protruding on a surface of the mounting support, which limits a relative movement at least of the coil brace in at least one direction relative to the mounting support by a contact of the at least one first stop area with the coil brace.