Microneedle Patch With Force Feedback for Reliable Self-Application

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing microneedle arrays face challenges such as cumbersome applicators, high cost, cross-contamination issues, and difficulties in verifying effective administration of therapeutic agents, along with manufacturing scale-up and stability of therapeutic agents.

Innovation Solution

A microneedle patch design with a tab portion for easy handling, a tray system for storage and protection, and mechanical force indicators for proper application, along with dissolvable microneedles for easy insertion and release of therapeutic agents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If separate complex applicators are used to apply microneedle patches, then microneedle insertion reliability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicroneedle insertion reliabilityVSAvoidapplicator complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the separate applicator device from the system and extracts only the essential function of force application, which is achieved by the user's manual pressing action on the patch itself. This eliminates the complex applicator while maintaining insertion reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The microneedle patch is designed to be self-applied by the user through manual pressing, without requiring a separate applicator device. The patch structure itself enables the insertion function, making the system self-sufficient and eliminating additional components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If integrated applicators are used in microneedle devices, then microneedle insertion reliability is improved, but device dimensionality and wearability increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicroneedle insertion reliabilityVSAvoidpatch thickness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the integrated applicator structure from the patch design, extracting only the essential force application function which is achieved through external manual pressing. This maintains insertion reliability while preserving patch thinness and wearability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Device complexity

If manual handling without tab is used, then device simplicity is improved, but handling ease and contamination risk worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatch structure simplicityVSAvoidhandling ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patch is segmented into functional layers including a handle layer with a tab portion that extends from the adhesive layer. This tab provides a dedicated handling interface that separates the user's fingers from the microneedles and adhesive, improving ease of operation without adding significant complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If complex applicators are used for mass vaccinations, then insertion reliability is improved, but cross-contamination risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsertion reliabilityVSAvoidcross-contamination risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Each microneedle patch is designed as a self-contained, self-applied unit that requires no shared applicator device. The user directly applies the patch to the skin, eliminating cross-contamination risks associated with shared applicators while maintaining insertion reliability through proper patch design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

5Productivity

If microneedles are small in size, then transdermal delivery effectiveness is improved, but verification of effective administration becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrug delivery effectivenessVSAvoidadministration verification difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates visual indicators such as color changes or visible markers on the patch or at the application site that indicate successful microneedle insertion and drug delivery. This allows easy verification of effective administration despite the small size of the microneedles themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Data Source

PatentEP4098313B1Microneedle patch
Publication Date: 2026.05.06 GEORGIA TECH RES CORP
  • EP4098313B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1C
  • EP4098313B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP4098313B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

A microneedle patch for administration of a substance of interest into a biological tissue, the microneedle patch comprising: a base substrate having a microneedle side and an opposing back side; solid microneedles extending from the microneedle side of the base substrate, the solid microneedles being formed of a composition which comprises (i) a substance of interest selected from active pharmaceutical ingredients, allergens, vitamins, cosmetic agents, cosmeceuticals, and markers, and (ii) a matrix material in which the substance of interest is dispersed; and an indicator connected to the opposing back side of the base substrate, wherein the indicator is configured to provide an audible, tactile, and visual signal when a force applied to the patch by a user, in the course of applying the patch to a biological tissue to insert the solid microneedles into the biological tissue, meets or exceeds a predetermined threshold.