Hierarchical Microstructured Surface for Adhesion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for creating microstructured surfaces mimicking the rose petal effect are limited by complex manufacturing processes, high material costs, and the inability to replicate the natural surface's hierarchical structure effectively, particularly due to the constraints of stereolithography and the need for multiple materials and steps.

Innovation Solution

A microstructured surface with multiple tiers of features, including an undulating surface with rounded peaks and valleys, smaller microstructured projections and cavities, and flutes or ribs, designed to increase surface area and affect adhesion, friction, hydrophilicity, and hydrophobicity, while allowing liquid penetration and maintaining structural strength, using a single compression molding step.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If stereolithography is used to create pyramidal microstructures, then the surface can achieve some superhydrophobic properties, but the manufacturing process becomes complex and limited to specific angles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuperhydrophobic propertiesVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent copies the natural hierarchical microstructure pattern found on rose petals, which consists of rounded bumps with smaller protrusions. This natural template is replicated through compression molding, avoiding the angle limitations of stereolithography while achieving the desired superhydrophobic effect through faithful reproduction of nature's optimized structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the microstructures from the pyramidal shapes with fixed 54.7-degree angles produced by stereolithography to rounded bumps with variable curvatures. This parameter change allows for more versatile manufacturing methods including compression molding, and better replicates the natural rose petal surface geometry

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multiple materials and steps are used to create microstructured surfaces, then the surface properties can be optimized, but the manufacturing time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface propertiesVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple microstructure features (rounded bumps, smaller protrusions, and surface texture) into a single integrated hierarchical structure that is formed in one compression molding step. This merging of features eliminates the need for sequential manufacturing steps and multiple material applications, reducing both time and cost while maintaining optimized surface properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The compression molding process is designed to create a multi-functional microstructured surface that simultaneously achieves superhydrophobicity, enhanced adhesion, and controlled friction. This single process replaces multiple specialized steps that would otherwise be needed to achieve each property separately

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If electroforming is used to create microstructured surfaces, then the process is simple and fast, but it requires metal substrates and increases room for error in solution preparation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing speedVSAvoidprocess simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the electrochemical deposition process with a mechanical compression molding process. This substitution eliminates the need for electrolyte solutions, metal substrates, and electrical equipment, while maintaining the simplicity and speed of production through a straightforward mechanical forming operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If hierarchical microstructures are created to increase surface area, then adhesion and superhydrophobicity are enhanced, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesion and superhydrophobicityVSAvoidmicrostructure precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the hierarchical microstructure into distinct size levels (larger rounded bumps with smaller protrusions), where each level contributes differently to the overall function. This segmentation allows each level to be optimized independently for its specific role while being formed through a single molding process, reducing the cumulative precision requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances the rose petal effect by achieving higher adhesive and superhydrophobic properties with reduced manufacturing complexity and cost, enabling broader industrial applications, including medical devices, by creating a surface with increased sliding friction and adhesion on wet surfaces.

Implementation Method 1

a substrate having increased surface area through a hierarchical arrangement of multiple shapes and sizes of micro features

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface area enhancement through hierarchical microstructures:

Implementation Method 2

providing a surface that is superhydrophobic while having enhanced sliding friction and adhesion when placed against liquid covered surfaces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuperhydrophobic effect:

Implementation Method 3

The surface of a rose petal is covered by hierarchical micro- and nanostructures, which allow a droplet of water to rest with a high contact angle and a high pinning force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPining force effect:

Implementation Method 4

The wetting regime of the rose petal effect is a combination of Cassie-Baxter and Wenzel wetting regimes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCassie-Baxter wetting regime:

Implementation Method 5

The wetting regime of the rose petal effect is a combination of Cassie-Baxter and Wenzel wetting regimes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWenzel wetting regime:

Data Source

PatentEP3390273B1Microstructured surface
Publication Date: 2021.09.01 HOOWAKI LLC
  • EP3390273B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3390273B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3390273B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A substrate having an undulating surface forming a series of rounded peaks and valleys that produce a continuously curving surface across at least a portion of the substrate. The undulating surface defines a first set of micro features. A second set of micro features molded on the first set of micro features. The substrate is a compression molded polymeric material in which the first and second sets of micro features are formed on the substrate during a single molding step, and wherein the first and second sets of micro features cooperate to increase the surface area and affect at least one of adhesion, friction, hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity of the substrate.