ML-Based Positioning Technique Selection for Dynamic RF Conditions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional RF management systems require manual definition of RF characteristics, leading to sub-optimal performance due to inaccuracies and inefficiencies in managing multiple positioning techniques, which are affected by environmental variables and obstacles, resulting in inconsistent accuracy and reliability.

Innovation Solution

Utilizing machine learning models trained with data collected by mobile devices to predict the most accurate positioning technique based on real-time environmental factors and RF characteristics, enabling dynamic RF management and improved positioning accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple positioning techniques are employed simultaneously, then positioning reliability is improved, but system complexity and power consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes operational parameters by selecting different positioning techniques based on environmental conditions. The machine learning model predicts the most suitable positioning technique for current environmental parameters, allowing the system to adapt between multiple techniques without permanently maintaining all of them, thus improving reliability while controlling complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic selection of positioning techniques rather than static configuration. The machine learning model continuously predicts the optimal positioning technique based on real-time environmental factors, enabling the system to transition between different positioning methods as conditions change, balancing reliability and complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If manual RF characteristic definition is used, then device complexity is reduced, but positioning accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidpositioning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-characterization by automatically defining RF characteristics through machine learning models trained on environmental data. Instead of requiring manual configuration, the system autonomously learns and adapts to the specific RF environment, improving positioning accuracy without significantly increasing device complexity since the learning process is automated

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary environmental characterization and machine learning model training before actual positioning operations. This advance preparation allows the system to have accurate RF characteristic definitions ready when needed, improving positioning accuracy without adding complexity to the real-time positioning process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If all positioning techniques are activated continuously, then positioning accuracy is maintained, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by activating only the subset of positioning techniques that are predicted to be most effective for current environmental conditions. The machine learning model identifies which techniques will provide sufficient accuracy, allowing the system to deactivate unnecessary techniques and reduce power consumption while maintaining adequate positioning accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Device complexity

If environmental variables are not considered, then system complexity is reduced, but positioning accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidpositioning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model serves multiple functions: it characterizes the environment, predicts positioning technique accuracy, and selects optimal techniques. This multi-functionality allows the system to consider environmental variables without proportionally increasing complexity, as the same model infrastructure handles multiple tasks related to environmental awareness and positioning optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12596954B2Machine learning for management of positioning techniques and radio frequency usage
Publication Date: 2026.04.07 CISCO TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US12596954B2 patent drawing
  • US12596954B2 patent drawing
  • US12596954B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for improved networking are provided. An indication that a mobile device is in a first region of a physical space is received, and one or more current exogenous factors are determined for the physical space. Positioning technique accuracy is predicted for each respective positioning technique of a plurality of positioning techniques by processing the indication of the first region and the one or more current exogenous factors using a machine learning model. A first positioning technique of the plurality of positioning techniques is selected based on the predicted positioning technique accuracies.