ML Traffic Prediction Using Sensor Fusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods fail to effectively predict traffic congestion and associated pollution levels in real-time, leading to increased emissions, noise pollution, and inefficient navigation.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing image sensors and environmental sensors, combined with machine learning models, processes images and data to predict traffic and pollution levels, providing users with real-time and future predictions through a user interface, allowing for efficient route optimization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If real-time traffic prediction systems are implemented, then navigation efficiency and route optimization improve, but system complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments traffic prediction into multiple specialized machine learning models: image processing models for visual traffic data, sensor data processing models for environmental measurements, historical data analysis models, and integration models that combine all inputs. This modular segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while maintaining overall system efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary processing of traffic images, sensor data, and historical information before final prediction. Machine learning models pre-process and extract relevant features from raw data streams, preparing optimized inputs for the final traffic level and pollution level predictions, thereby reducing computational burden during real-time operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If multiple sensors and machine learning models are integrated, then prediction accuracy improves, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements partial processing by focusing machine learning models on extracting only the most critical features from sensor data and images that directly impact traffic and pollution predictions. This selective feature extraction maintains high prediction accuracy while significantly reducing processing time compared to analyzing all available data in full detail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces traditional mechanical traffic monitoring methods with machine learning-based predictive analytics. Instead of relying on simple sensor thresholds or rule-based systems, intelligent algorithms automatically analyze patterns in image, sensor, and historical data to generate accurate predictions, achieving superior accuracy with optimized processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If historical traffic data is analyzed, then prediction reliability improves, but data processing complexity and storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction reliabilityVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential patterns and features from historical traffic data that are most relevant to predicting current and future traffic conditions. Machine learning models identify and extract key temporal patterns, peak hours, and recurring traffic behaviors, discarding redundant information. This extraction approach maintains prediction reliability while reducing data processing complexity and storage requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Object-generated harmful factors

If traffic congestion is reduced through better predictions, then environmental pollution decreases, but implementation costs and infrastructure requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepollution levelsVSAvoidinfrastructure requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses multi-functional machine learning models that simultaneously predict both traffic levels and pollution levels from the same set of inputs (images, sensor data, historical information). This universal approach allows the system to provide dual benefits: traffic optimization and pollution reduction, without requiring separate infrastructure or processing systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12106662B1Machine learning traffic determination
Publication Date: 2024.10.01 JHAMB AADITYA
  • US12106662B1 patent drawing
  • US12106662B1 patent drawing
  • US12106662B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatuses, systems, methods, and computer program products for machine learning traffic determination. A method includes receiving an image of vehicular traffic taken by an image sensor. A method includes receiving environmental data from a plurality of environmental sensors. A method includes determining a history of vehicular traffic in a geographic area associated with an image sensor. A method includes processing an image of vehicular traffic, environmental data, and a history of vehicular traffic using one or more machine learning models to predict a traffic level and a pollution level for a geographic area. A method includes communicating one or more of a predicted traffic level and a predicted pollution level to a user on an electronic display screen of a hardware computing device.