Mobile Robot Sensor Adaptation for Dynamic Navigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mobile robot navigation and safety systems are limited by simple kinematic and dynamic models, leading to conservative operation and inflexible safety controls that do not account for payloads, resulting in inefficient navigation and increased costs due to manual configuration requirements.

Innovation Solution

The system adapts sensor operation to prioritize data capture in critical sensor regions defined by angular and linear velocities, payload, and environmental conditions, allowing for more flexible and efficient navigation by adjusting sensor ranges and trajectories.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If simple kinematic and dynamic models are used for navigation, then system complexity is reduced, but navigation efficiency and performance deteriorate due to conservative constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation system complexityVSAvoidnavigation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic sensor operation where detection regions and sampling rates are continuously adjusted based on real-time robot velocity (angular and linear). This dynamic adaptation allows the system to operate closer to physical limits while maintaining safety, resolving the contradiction between system complexity and navigation efficiency by making the system adaptive rather than statically complex

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (sensor detection region size, sensor sampling rate) based on robot velocity states. At higher velocities, the system expands detection regions and increases sampling rates, while at lower velocities it reduces them. This parameter adaptation enables efficient navigation without requiring permanently complex system architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If highly discretized states are used in safety systems, then system simplicity is maintained, but performance and flexibility deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety system complexityVSAvoidsafety system flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The safety system dynamically adjusts sensor operation based on continuous velocity measurements rather than discrete states. The detection region and sampling rate continuously adapt to the robot's current velocity, providing flexible and precise safety control without relying on highly discretized states, thus maintaining both simplicity and flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual configuration is required for safety systems, then system adaptability is reduced, but configuration precision can be controlled, however operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem configurabilityVSAvoidoperational costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-configuration by automatically determining appropriate sensor detection regions and sampling rates based on real-time velocity measurements. This self-service capability eliminates the need for manual configuration while adapting to different operating conditions, reducing operational costs and increasing adaptability simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If sensor detection regions are expanded to cover all potential collision zones, then safety is improved, but energy consumption and data processing load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidance safetyVSAvoidsensor energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by concentrating sensor detection resources in critical regions determined by current velocity. Instead of uniformly expanding detection regions everywhere, the system selectively focuses sensing capacity on directions and distances most relevant to current motion, improving safety where needed while reducing energy consumption in less critical areas

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by activating enhanced detection only when and where necessary based on velocity thresholds. At low velocities, reduced detection regions suffice, while at high velocities, expanded detection is applied selectively. This avoids the excessive energy consumption of maintaining full detection coverage at all times

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20240094737A1Systems and methods for operating a mobile robot
Publication Date: 2024.03.21 ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECH INC
  • US20240094737A1 patent drawing
  • US20240094737A1 patent drawing
  • US20240094737A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for operating a mobile robot is disclosed. The system can include a processor and a plurality of sensors mounted on the mobile robot. The method includes operating the mobile robot to autonomously navigate along a trajectory. While the mobile robot autonomously navigates along the trajectory, the method involves operating the processor to: monitor an angular velocity and a linear velocity of the mobile robot; determine one or more critical sensor regions defined with reference to the mobile robot based at least on the angular velocity and the linear velocity of the mobile robot; and adapt the operation of the plurality of sensors to prioritize capture of sensor data within the one or more critical sensor regions. Each sensor can be operable to capture the sensor data for an adjustable detection region defined with respect to the sensor and the mobile robot.