Modular Buoy Device Using Fibreglass Composite Modules

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing turret buoy systems for offshore hydrocarbon production are large, heavy, and costly to construct, transport, and install, requiring extensive fabrication and contingency design for potential buoyancy chamber damage.

Innovation Solution

A buoy device comprising a first part with a support structure and a second part with buoyancy elements that can be connected via rotation, using polyurethane foam-filled modules with fibreglass shells for buoyancy, allowing for modular assembly and easy replacement of damaged modules, reducing weight and fabrication time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional steel buoyancy chambers are used, then structural strength and reliability are improved, but weight and fabrication cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebuoyancy chamber reliabilityVSAvoidbuoy device weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses fibreglass-reinforced plastic (FRP) composite material to replace traditional steel buoyancy chambers. The fibreglass shell provides sufficient structural strength and reliability while dramatically reducing the weight of the buoy device, directly resolving the contradiction between reliability and weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the material parameter from steel to fibreglass composite, which has fundamentally different density and strength-to-weight characteristics. This parameter change enables the buoyancy chambers to be lighter while maintaining or improving reliability through the composite material's inherent properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If traditional steel buoyancy chambers with bulkheads are used, then contingency design for damage is improved, but fabrication time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontingency design capabilityVSAvoidfabrication time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The fibreglass composite material allows for monolithic or simplified segmented buoyancy chamber construction without requiring complex internal bulkhead structures. The material's inherent damage tolerance and ease of repair maintain contingency design capability while dramatically reducing fabrication time and complexity compared to steel construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The buoyancy chambers can be designed as separate modular units that are easier to fabricate and assemble using fibreglass composite material. This segmentation, combined with the material's properties, reduces overall fabrication time while maintaining reliability through modular replaceability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of repair

If modular buoyancy elements are used, then ease of repair and assembly is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodule replacement easeVSAvoidmodular assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The buoyancy chambers are designed as separate modular elements that can be independently fabricated, transported, and assembled. The fibreglass composite material simplifies the connection interfaces between modules, making assembly and repair easier while the modular design itself manages complexity through standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The use of fibreglass composite material changes the physical parameters of the modular interfaces, allowing for simpler connection methods such as mechanical fasteners or adhesive bonds instead of complex welding procedures required for steel, thereby reducing assembly complexity while maintaining ease of repair.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution results in a significantly lighter buoy device that can be assembled more quickly and cost-effectively, with reduced lifting weights and no need for contingency design, enabling flexible buoyancy adjustment and reduced material usage.

Implementation Method 1

a second part (30) having buoyancy means and a second support structure; the buoyancy means comprises a plurality of buoyancy elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Data Source

PatentUS10647390B2Buoy device
Publication Date: 2020.05.12 CAN SYST AS
  • US10647390B2 patent drawing
  • US10647390B2 patent drawing
  • US10647390B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A buoy device includes a first part having a first support structure and a second part having a buoyant body and a second support structure. The first and second support structures are connectable to form a rotatable connection between the first part and the second part. The buoyant body further includes one or more buoyancy elements releasably arranged on the second part. The buoy device may be a turret buoy, a CALM turret buoy, or a CALM turntable buoy.