Modular Jack Pin Structure for Crosstalk Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

RJ-45 modular jacks experience significant crosstalk and loss due to the legacy design of RJ-45 connectors, which are inadequate for high-frequency data transmission, leading to impedance mismatches and increased near-end crosstalk (NEXT) and far-end crosstalk (FEXT) between adjacent wire pairs.

Innovation Solution

A pin structure for modular jacks with specifically designed resilient pins featuring V-shaped electrically conducting and contacting segments, strategically spaced and angled to minimize capacitive and inductive couplings, forming differential pairs that compensate for noise signals with equal magnitude and opposite polarity, thereby reducing crosstalk and loss.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the standard RJ-45 jack housing utilizes a straightforward design with uniformly spaced resilient pins, then the device complexity is low and manufacturing is easy, but crosstalk coupling increases significantly at high frequencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidcrosstalk coupling
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by positioning resilient pins at non-uniform intervals and orienting them at different angles relative to adjacent pins. Specifically, pins are spaced closer to differential pairs that experience higher crosstalk and angled to reduce capacitive and inductive coupling, creating an asymmetric configuration that optimizes high-frequency performance while maintaining manufacturing feasibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by varying the spacing and orientation of individual resilient pins based on their specific position and the crosstalk characteristics of adjacent wire pairs. Each pin is strategically positioned to address local coupling issues, with closer spacing to differential pairs that need more shielding and specific angles to minimize capacitive coupling in high-crosstalk regions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If resilient pins are uniformly spaced and parallel aligned, then the structural simplicity is maintained, but near-end crosstalk (NEXT) and far-end crosstalk (FEXT) increase dramatically

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidsignal transmission reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs asymmetry by configuring resilient pins with non-uniform spacing and varied orientations. Pins are positioned at different distances from differential pairs and angled at different degrees to compensate for asymmetric crosstalk patterns, thereby reducing NEXT and FEXT while maintaining reasonable structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the spacing intervals and angular orientations of resilient pins to optimize transmission performance. Specific parameters such as pin-to-pair distance and pin angle are adjusted based on electromagnetic coupling analysis to minimize crosstalk and improve signal integrity at high frequencies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If contact blades have large area to react as transmitting and receiving antenna, then the electrical contact quality is improved, but capacitive and inductive couplings between adjacent pairs worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical contact qualityVSAvoidcapacitive and inductive couplings
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by varying the dimensions and orientation of contact blades at different positions. Contact blades are designed with specific widths and angles tailored to their location, with narrower or differently oriented blades in regions where capacitive and inductive coupling would be most problematic, while maintaining sufficient contact area for reliable electrical connection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The pin structure effectively reduces crosstalk and loss, meeting strict standards by controlling impedance and minimizing fringing fields, resulting in improved signal integrity and compliance with high-frequency data transmission requirements.

Implementation Method 1

capacitive and inductive couplings are parasitized therein. The contact blades have a large area to react themselves as a transmitting and receiving antenna

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitive coupling: Capacitance

Implementation Method 2

capacitive and inductive couplings are parasitized therein. Among all the signal interference, the near end coupling between Pair 1 and Pair 3 is the most severe one

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInductive coupling: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

The way it works is having signals transmitted on each conductor with equal magnitudes but opposite phases. Data transmission using differential pair technique is acknowledged as balanced transmission. Comparing to single-ended transmission, differential signals are generally more immune to the effects of external electrical noises

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDifferential signal transmission:

Implementation Method 4

The pin structure effectively reduces crosstalk and loss, meeting strict standards by controlling impedance and minimizing fringing fields

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpedance control: Electrical Impedance Tomography

Implementation Method 5

The pin structure effectively reduces crosstalk and loss, meeting strict standards by controlling impedance and minimizing fringing fields

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFringing fields:

Data Source

PatentUS20160126676A1Pin structure of modular jack
Publication Date: 2016.05.05 HSING CHAU INDAL
  • US20160126676A1 patent drawing
  • US20160126676A1 patent drawing
  • US20160126676A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A pin structure of a modular jack has eight resilient pins. The two intermediate resilient pins have two electrically conducting segments vertically spaced apart and are each wide and have two electrically contacting segments transversely spaced apart and are each slender, whereas the other resilient pins are transversely and consecutively spaced apart and disposed on two sides of the two intermediate resilient pins and are each slender. The electrically fixing ends of the first, third, fifth, seventh resilient pins lie in a first straight line. The electrically fixing ends of the second, fourth, sixth, eighth resilient pins lie in a second straight line. The first and second straight lines are spaced apart and lie on the same plane. The resilient pins have V-shaped electrically contacting portions lying in a third straight line. Hence, the pin structure of a modular jack reduces crosstalk and loss and thereby meets strict standards.