Modular Liquid Cooling Architecture With PLC-Governed Immersion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cooling systems for computer hardware in datacenters face inefficiencies due to disparate cooling needs of different components, leading to unnecessary expense and resource wastage, especially when immersion cooling is required for some components but not others, and direct communication between components with varying cooling requirements is desired.

Innovation Solution

A modular liquid cooling system comprising infrastructure and payload modules, where the infrastructure module uses convective air cooling or cold plates, and the payload module uses immersion cooling, governed by a programmable logic controller (PLC) for centralized management, allowing flexible deployment and efficient heat transfer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If immersion cooling is used for all components in a datacenter, then high-power components are effectively cooled, but low-power components waste cooling resources and increase system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling effectivenessVSAvoidcooling resource wastage
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The datacenter is divided into multiple zones with different cooling methods: immersion cooling zones for high-power components and convective cooling zones for low-power components. This segmentation allows each component type to receive appropriate cooling, eliminating waste while maintaining effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different cooling methods are applied to different locations within the datacenter based on local heat generation characteristics. High-power components are placed in immersion cooling zones, while low-power components are placed in convective cooling zones, optimizing resource allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If all components are placed in a single immersion cooling tank, then direct communication between components is simplified, but components with low cooling needs waste resources and increase tank crowding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent accessibilityVSAvoidcooling fluid volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments components into different cooling zones rather than placing all components in a single tank. This allows selective immersion cooling for high-power components while maintaining convective cooling for low-power components, reducing overall cooling fluid volume requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If a unified cooling system is implemented for all hardware, then system simplicity is maintained, but flexibility to accommodate disparate cooling needs is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling system structureVSAvoidcooling method flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The datacenter cooling system is designed to support multiple cooling methods simultaneously (immersion cooling and convective cooling), allowing it to adapt to different component requirements. This multi-functionality provides flexibility while maintaining a unified architectural framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically assigns cooling methods to different components based on their thermal characteristics and cooling requirements. This dynamic allocation allows the system to adapt to varying hardware needs without requiring a completely separate cooling infrastructure for each component type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient cooling of components with varying power consumption levels in a single location, optimizing resource use and simplifying maintenance by centralizing control, while allowing easy access and reducing unnecessary immersion cooling expenses.

Implementation Method 1

a liquid-air heat exchanger

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Implementation Method 2

cold plates with heat transferred locally to facility water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 3

immersion cooling systems may include a tank in which computer hardware may be immersed in evaporable liquid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase change: Phase Change

Implementation Method 4

evaporable liquid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 5

a condenser positioned above the tank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Data Source

PatentUS12426208B2Modular liquid cooling architecture for liquid cooling
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 GOOGLE LLC
  • US12426208B2 patent drawing
  • US12426208B2 patent drawing
  • US12426208B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A housing and cooling system for computer hardware includes an infrastructure module and a payload module. The infrastructure module is configured for housing computer hardware and is equipped with either or both of a convective air cooling system and an arrangement of metal plates connected by one or more conduits for carrying liquid for cooling computer equipment housed by the infrastructure module. The infrastructure modules also houses a programmable logic controller (“PLC”). The payload module includes an immersion cooling system governed by the PLC and is located outside of the infrastructure module.