Modular Pedal Simulator Structure for Mechanical Brake Feel

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional pedal simulators for electro mechanical brakes have complexity and part count issues, which increase the difficulty in mimicking mechanical brake performance and are not adaptable to different pedal types.

Innovation Solution

A pedal simulator with a simplified structure comprising a housing part, piston part, elastic part, damper part, and cap part, which allows for adjustable pedal effort and stroke measurement, and is adaptable to various pedal types through a modular design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple springs and dampers are used to increase similarity with mechanical booster, then braking sense is improved, but device complexity and number of parts increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking sense similarityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple spring elements into a single integrated elastic member (300) that provides both the first elastic force and second elastic force functions. This merging of multiple components into one reduces structural complexity while maintaining the braking sense similarity to mechanical boosters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The elastic member (300) serves multiple functions: it acts as both the first elastic member supporting the piston body and the second elastic member supporting the piston rod, replacing what would traditionally require separate springs and dampers. This multi-functionality reduces the number of parts while achieving the desired braking sensation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If conventional pedal simulator structure is used, then braking sense is provided, but repair and replacement costs increase due to complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking sense provisionVSAvoidrepair cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

By integrating multiple elastic support functions into a single elastic member (300), the patent reduces the number of replaceable components. This simplification directly lowers repair and replacement costs while maintaining the essential braking sense provision function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and eliminates unnecessary intermediate components (such as separate return springs and complex mounting mechanisms) from the conventional design, retaining only the essential elastic support function through a simplified elastic member, thereby reducing maintenance complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If conventional pedal simulator design is used, then braking sense is achieved, but adaptability to different pedal types is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking sense generationVSAvoidpedal type adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The simplified elastic member (300) design with its dual support function creates a universal pedal simulator structure that can be adapted to different pedal types (accelerator, brake, clutch) without requiring type-specific components, thereby improving versatility while maintaining braking sense generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the pedal simulator into modular components (housing part, piston part, elastic member) that can be independently configured for different pedal applications, enhancing adaptability across various pedal types while preserving the core braking sense generation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The simplified structure reduces repair and replacement costs, improves productivity, and provides adaptable braking sensations across different pedal types, while eliminating the need for a pedal return spring.

Implementation Method 1

an elastic part elastically supporting the piston part within the housing part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a damper part provided in the piston part and compressed onto the housing part by a contact

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS12409814B2Pedal simulator of vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.09.09 HYUNDAI MOBIS CO LTD
  • US12409814B2 patent drawing
  • US12409814B2 patent drawing
  • US12409814B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a pedal simulator of a vehicle, the pedal simulator includes a piston part slidably disposed in the housing part, an elastic part elastically supporting the piston part within the housing part, a damper part provided in the piston part and compressed onto the housing part by a contact, and a hollow cap part combined with the piston part and interposed between the piston part and the damper part.