Molecule Synthesis Parameter Blocks for Flexible Reagent Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for synthesizing molecules, such as oligonucleotides and oligopeptides, lack flexibility in synthesis methods, chemistry, and scale, and are inefficient in reagent use.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and device that control the synthesis process through blocks of parameters, allowing for user input to modify and optimize cycles and process steps, including global, type-specific, or selected cycle modifications, to enhance efficiency and reagent usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional methods are used for synthesizing molecules, then the synthesis process is simple to implement, but the flexibility in synthesis methods, chemistry and scale is limited and reagent efficiency is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in synthesis methods, chemistry and scaleVSAvoidcomplexity of control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements flexibility through parameter blocks that define synthesis conditions. Each cycle and process step can be controlled by adjustable parameters such as reagent volumes, flow rates, temperatures, and reaction times. This allows the same device to perform different synthesis methods and scales by simply changing parameter values without modifying the physical device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic control where process cycles can be repeated with modified parameters. The device transitions from static conventional methods to dynamic adaptable synthesis by allowing real-time adjustment of synthesis conditions, cycle repetitions, and parameter optimization based on specific molecular synthesis requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If conventional synthesis methods are used, then the device structure is simple, but the efficiency in reagent use is not optimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency in reagent useVSAvoidreagent consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control through monitoring synthesis progress and adjusting reagent delivery accordingly. The system tracks coupling efficiency, oxidation completeness, and capping effectiveness, then optimizes subsequent reagent usage based on this feedback, minimizing waste while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Reagent efficiency is improved through optimized parameter settings including precise control of reagent volumes, concentrations, and delivery timing. The system adjusts parameters such as amidite equivalents, coupling time, and wash volumes to achieve optimal reagent utilization, reducing both excess reagent waste and insufficient reaction conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If conventional synthesis methods are used, then the operation procedure is straightforward, but the synthesis scale is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynthesis scaleVSAvoidoperation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The device achieves multi-functionality by combining microfluidic precision with scalable architecture. The same device can perform small-scale high-precision synthesis and scale up to larger production volumes by adjusting parameter blocks, making it universally applicable across different synthesis scales without requiring multiple specialized devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The synthesis process is segmented into modular process steps (detritylation, coupling, oxidation, capping) that can be independently controlled and optimized. This segmentation allows flexible scaling by repeating cycles with adjusted parameters, enabling the system to handle both small and large synthesis quantities through systematic repetition rather than monolithic process design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250214053A1Method and device for synthesizing molecules
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 CYTIVA SWEDEN AB
  • US20250214053A1 patent drawing
  • US20250214053A1 patent drawing
  • US20250214053A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a computer implemented method performed by a device (600) configured to synthesize molecules, wherein the synthesizing comprises performing cycles of a plurality of process steps (PS1-PS4), wherein the synthesizing is controlled by blocks of parameters, the method comprising receiving an indication of a target molecule, generating a synthesizing process description (300) by generating a plurality of blocks (310) of parameters, each block (310) controlling process steps of a respective cycle, receiving user input indicative of modification of the generated plurality of blocks of parameters, modifying the generated plurality of blocks of parameters using the user input, controlling synthesizing of the target molecule by applying the modified plurality of blocks of parameters to control of the respective cycles.