Monolithic Attitude Control Motor Frame for Dense Thrust Packaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional attitude control motors are bulky and inefficient in terms of volume-to-thrust output ratio, requiring significant vehicle space and employing expensive valve systems, while solid gas generators waste propellant due to constant mass flow and venting needs.

Innovation Solution

A monolithic attitude control motor system with shared pressure vessel walls distributes operational pressure loads across a monolithic frame, integrating multiple attitude control motors in a honeycomb structure for efficient packing and thrust generation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If conventional attitude control motors are used, then thrust control is achieved, but vehicle volume requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethrust outputVSAvoidvehicle volume
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple attitude control motors are merged into a single monolithic pressure vessel structure, where adjacent motors share common walls. This integration reduces the total volume required compared to separate motors, as the shared walls eliminate redundant structure and allow efficient space utilization through the honeycomb arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The attitude control motors are nested within a monolithic pressure vessel frame, with each motor occupying a cavity formed by shared walls. The honeycomb structure allows motors to be tightly packed and nested together, maximizing the use of available volume while minimizing the overall space required for the thrust control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Quantity of substance

If solid gas generators with valve systems are used, then impulse packaging is improved, but system cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpulse packagingVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The expensive valve and actuation systems are extracted and eliminated from the design. The monolithic attitude control motors use a simpler ignition and thrust control mechanism without requiring complex valve systems, thereby reducing system cost while maintaining effective impulse packaging capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The design employs simpler, more cost-effective motor units that can be ignited and expended without requiring expensive reusable valve systems. Each motor unit is designed for single-use operation, eliminating the need for costly actuation and valve components while achieving the required impulse packaging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Power

If solid gas generators with constant mass flow are used, then thrust control is achieved, but propellant efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethrust controlVSAvoidpropellant efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The attitude control motors employ periodic pulsed ignition rather than continuous constant mass flow. Each motor is ignited in discrete pulses to provide the required thrust control, allowing the propellant to be consumed only when needed and eliminating the continuous venting that wastes propellant in constant flow systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves higher packaging efficiency, increased total impulse, and better pressurization force resolution compared to conventional systems, reducing vehicle volume requirements and costs.

Implementation Method 1

shared pressure vessel walls to distribute the operational pressure loads throughout the structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure distribution: Pascal's Law

Data Source

PatentUS12481287B2Monolithic attitude control motor frame and system
Publication Date: 2025.11.25 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
  • US12481287B2 patent drawing
  • US12481287B2 patent drawing
  • US12481287B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A monolithic attitude control motor frame includes a monolithic structure including an outer surface of revolution and a plurality of side walls defining a plurality of cavities extending radially from the outer surface of revolution. Adjacent cavities of the plurality of cavities share a side wall or side wall portion therebetween. Each of the cavities is configured to receive an attitude control motor. A monolithic attitude control motor system includes a monolithic frame including an outer surface of revolution and a plurality of side walls defining a plurality of cavities extending radially from the outer surface of revolution. The system further includes a plurality of attitude control motors corresponding to the plurality of cavities, such that an attitude control motor of the plurality of attitude control motors is disposed in each cavity of the plurality of cavities.