Monolithic Attitude Control Motor Frame for Compact Thrust Packaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional attitude control motor systems are bulky and inefficient in packaging thrust, requiring significant vehicle volume for limited thrust output, and are expensive due to complex valve and actuation systems, making them unsuitable for vehicles with limited space.

Innovation Solution

A monolithic attitude control motor system that utilizes shared pressure vessel walls to distribute operational pressure loads, allowing for a more compact and efficient arrangement of attitude control motors, which reduces the overall structure size and enhances packaging efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional attitude control motors are used, then thrust control is achieved, but the system requires significant vehicle volume for limited thrust output

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethrust outputVSAvoidvehicle volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple individual attitude control motors into a single monolithic structure where multiple motor chambers share common pressure vessel walls. This consolidation integrates what were previously separate self-contained motors into one unified system, reducing the total volume required while maintaining the same thrust control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The monolithic pressure vessel structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it acts as the pressure containment for multiple motor chambers, provides structural support, and enables thrust vectoring. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate pressure vessels for each motor, significantly reducing the overall system volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If conventional attitude control motor systems are used, then thrust control is achieved, but the structure is bulky and packaging efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethrust control capabilityVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple motor chambers are merged into a single monolithic pressure vessel with shared walls. This consolidation reduces the number of discrete components and simplifies the overall structure while maintaining the ability to independently control thrust in multiple directions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

While the pressure vessel is monolithic, the internal structure is segmented into multiple motor chambers that can be independently controlled. This segmentation allows for efficient packaging of multiple thrusters within a single compact structure, improving packaging efficiency without sacrificing control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Quantity of substance

If solid gas generators with valve systems are used, then impulse packaging is improved, but mass flow must remain constant requiring venting that wastes propellant

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpulse packagingVSAvoidpropellant waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The attitude control motors use periodic pulsed operation instead of continuous flow. Each motor can be fired in discrete bursts to achieve the required attitude adjustments, allowing the propellant to be consumed only when needed rather than requiring continuous mass flow and subsequent venting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system recovers propellant efficiency by using precise pulsed firing of individual motor chambers. Each chamber can be activated only when thrust is required, eliminating the need to vent excess propellant that would occur in continuous flow systems. The monolithic structure allows selective activation of chambers based on actual control needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The monolithic system achieves higher packaging efficiency, provides greater total impulse, and effectively resolves pressurization forces during operation, making it suitable for various types of vehicles with limited space.

Implementation Method 1

utilizes shared pressure vessel walls to distribute operational pressure loads

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure distribution: Pascal's Law

Data Source

PatentUS11803194B2Monolithic attitude control motor frame and system
Publication Date: 2023.10.31 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
  • US11803194B2 patent drawing
  • US11803194B2 patent drawing
  • US11803194B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A monolithic attitude control motor frame includes a monolithic structure including an outer surface of revolution and a plurality of side walls defining a plurality of cavities extending from the outer surface of revolution. Adjacent cavities of the plurality of cavities share a side wall or side wall portion therebetween. Each of the cavities is configured to receive an attitude control motor. A monolithic attitude control motor system includes a monolithic frame including an outer surface of revolution and a plurality of side walls defining a plurality of cavities extending radially from the outer surface of revolution. The system further includes a plurality of attitude control motors corresponding to the plurality of cavities, such that an attitude control motor of the plurality of attitude motors is disposed in each cavity of the plurality of cavities.