Motion Compensating Pile Upender for Offshore Wind

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for installing monopiles for offshore wind turbines face challenges such as excessive loads on cranes and equipment during upending, and limited weather windows due to vessel motion and sea conditions.

Innovation Solution

The method involves operating controllable motion actuators of the motion compensating support assembly to provide controlled motion of the lower end portion of the monopile, reducing or counteracting swing motion during upending, thereby reducing loads on equipment and increasing the weather window for installation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the monopile is upended by lifting the upper end portion by means of the crane, then the monopile can be installed in vertical orientation, but excessive loads are caused on the crane and motion compensating device during upending

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonopile installation capabilityVSAvoidloads on crane and equipment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The support assembly is made dynamically movable along the monopile length via motion actuators, allowing the support position to adapt during upending. This dynamic adjustment optimizes the load distribution and reduces peak loads on the crane by maintaining optimal leverage throughout the upending process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The position parameter of the support assembly is changed during the upending operation. By moving the support assembly along the monopile, the system changes the mechanical parameters (lever arms, support points) to minimize loads on the crane while maintaining control over the monopile's motion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If the monopile is upended in floating condition, then installation can proceed without jack-up operations, but swing motion of the monopile increases due to vessel motion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation process simplicityVSAvoidmonopile swing motion
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The motion actuators are controlled based on feedback from motion sensors that detect vessel motion and monopile position. This closed-loop control allows the support assembly to actively compensate for vessel motion, reducing monopile swing and improving stability during upending in floating condition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The motion compensating support assembly acts as an intermediary between the floating vessel and the monopile. It isolates the monopile from vessel motions by providing active compensation, allowing floating operation without excessive swing motion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Stability of the object's composition

If controllable motion actuators are operated to provide controlled motion of the lower end portion, then swing motion is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonopile swing reductionVSAvoidmotion compensating support assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The motion actuators serve multiple functions: they position the support assembly along the monopile, compensate for vessel motion, and reduce swing during upending. This multi-functionality justifies the added complexity by consolidating multiple control requirements into a single integrated system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP4422968B1Installation of a monopile that is adapted to support an offshore wind turbine
Publication Date: 2025.06.04 ITREC BV
  • EP4422968B1 patent drawingFigure 1

AI summary

Installation of a monopile adapted to support an offshore wind turbine is done using a vessel comprising a hull, a crane mounted on the hull, and a motion compensating integrated pile upending and holding device. The device comprises a motion compensating support assembly mounted to the hull of the vessel and a pile holder that is supported by the support assembly and is tiltable about horizontal tilt axis relative to the support assembly between a horizontal orientation and a vertical orientation. The device allows for upending of the monopile by means of the crane of the vessel whilst the lower end portion remains received and supported by the pile holder. During at least a phase of the upending of the monopile, one or more of the controllable motion actuators of the motion compensating support assembly are operated to provide controlled motion of the lower end portion of the monopile so as to reduce swing motion of the monopile.