Motor Control Device Abnormality Alarm Mode

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing motor control systems fail to effectively prevent recurring abnormalities due to incomplete investigation and reset processes, particularly for issues with high repeatability, leading to potential erroneous operations and machinery errors.

Innovation Solution

A motor control device with a control processing unit and abnormality determining unit that transitions from a normal mode to a specific abnormality alarm mode when an abnormality with high repeatability is detected, disabling reset and allowing only specific abnormality releasing processes to prevent recurrence.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a simple alarm reset process is allowed for all abnormalities, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to recurring abnormalities with high repeatability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm reset processVSAvoidabnormality recurrence prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The alarm abnormality releasing process is segmented into two distinct types: a first type that allows easy releasing by alarm releasing operations, and a second type that requires specific releasing operations. This segmentation enables differentiated handling based on abnormality characteristics, preventing simple resets for recurring issues while maintaining ease of operation for non-recurring alarms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of alarm releasing difficulty based on the determined type of abnormality. For abnormalities with high repeatability (second type), the releasing parameter is set to require specific operations, whereas for other abnormalities (first type), the parameter allows simple alarm releasing operations. This dynamic parameter adjustment resolves the contradiction between ease of operation and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If operation is inhibited for all important abnormalities, then reliability is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to unnecessary inhibition of low-repeatability abnormalities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation safetyVSAvoidmotor operation continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Abnormalities are segmented into two categories: those requiring operation inhibition (second type with high repeatability) and those allowing continued operation (first type). This segmentation ensures that only abnormalities with significant recurrence risk prevent motor operation, maintaining productivity while ensuring reliability for critical cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The operation inhibition parameter is changed based on the abnormality type determined by the determining unit. For second-type abnormalities, the parameter sets operation inhibition to prevent recurrence, while for first-type abnormalities, the parameter allows operation to continue. This conditional parameter adjustment balances reliability and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If alarm history is stored without source removal, then loss of information is reduced, but reliability worsens due to repeated abnormalities occurring after reset

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm history storageVSAvoidabnormality prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The determining unit provides feedback about the type of abnormality based on stored alarm history and determination results. This feedback mechanism enables the system to learn from past abnormalities and adjust the alarm releasing process accordingly, preventing simple resets for recurring issues while maintaining information storage for continuous improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9450532B2Motor control device and motor control system
Publication Date: 2016.09.20 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • US9450532B2 patent drawing
  • US9450532B2 patent drawing
  • US9450532B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A motor control device includes: a control processing unit that controls driving of a motor based on a command signal input from a controller so as to command an operation of the motor and a detection signal which is a detection result of the operation of the motor; and an abnormality determining unit that detects an abnormality in the controller, the motor control device, and the motor based on the command signal, the detection signal, and a control signal generated in the motor control device and that determines a level of repeatability of the detected abnormality based on a predetermined criterion. The control processing unit transitions from a normal mode to a specific abnormality alarm mode when the abnormality determining unit determines that an specific abnormality having high repeatability has occurred.