Motor-Integrated Bicycle Hub Recessed Case Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional motor-integrated bicycle hubs have a lengthened frame mount portion due to the internal placement of the motor control circuit, necessitating a dedicated frame for mounting, which is not compatible with existing frames.

Innovation Solution

A motor-integrated bicycle hub design featuring a recessed motor case that minimizes the frame mount length by housing the motor control circuit in a bulging portion, allowing for reduced overall length and compatibility with standard frames, while also incorporating features like a radiating member for heat management and atmospheric pressure equalization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the motor control circuit is arranged inside the hub, then the motor-integrated hub can be self-contained, but the length of the frame mount portion in the hub axle direction increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveself-contained capabilityVSAvoidframe mount portion length
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The motor control circuit is arranged in the radial direction (width) rather than extending the axial length. The circuit board is positioned between the stator and rotor, utilizing the radial space within the motor case, thereby maintaining compact axial length while achieving self-contained functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The motor control circuit is nested within the motor structure itself, specifically between the stator and rotor components. This nested arrangement allows the control circuit to be housed within the existing motor envelope without requiring additional axial length, making the hub self-contained while maintaining compact dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the frame mount portion length increases, then the motor control circuit can be housed inside, but the hub cannot be mounted to existing frames

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with existing framesVSAvoidhub internal volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The motor control circuit is arranged in the radial dimension rather than extending axially, allowing the hub to maintain its standard axial length for frame compatibility while still providing sufficient internal volume for the control circuit through optimized radial space utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The motor case is designed with a specific local structure that accommodates the motor control circuit board between the stator and rotor. This localized arrangement provides the necessary volume for the control circuit in a specific region without increasing the overall hub dimensions, preserving compatibility with existing frames.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Length of moving object

If the motor control circuit is housed in a bulging portion, then the frame mount length is minimized, but the internal space arrangement becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe mount portion lengthVSAvoidcase structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The motor case is segmented into distinct portions: a main body and a bulging portion. The bulging portion specifically accommodates the motor control circuit, separating it from other motor components. This segmentation allows the control circuit to be housed in a dedicated space that minimizes axial length while maintaining organizational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The bulging portion creates a localized region with increased radial depth specifically for the motor control circuit. This local structural variation provides the necessary space for the control circuit without increasing the overall axial length, while the segmentation into distinct case portions maintains manufacturing and assembly simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP2394903B1Motor-integrated bicycle hub
Publication Date: 2016.08.03 SHIMANO INC
  • EP2394903B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2394903B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2394903B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Problem: To minimize a length of a frame mount portion of a motor-integrated bicycle hub in a hub axle direction. Solution: A motor-integrated hub 10 includes a hub axle 15 and a motor case 17. The motor case 17 has a recessed portion 32a capable of receiving a front fork 103 and houses a motor. In the motor-integrated hub, the motor case has the recessed portion 32a capable of receiving a front frame of the bicycle. In this case, for example, the distal end portion of the front fork to which a wheel is mounted among the frame can be arranged at the recessed portion. Consequently, a space can be formed around the recessed portion and an electrical component or the like can be housed using the space.