Motorcycle Hotspot Detection via Movement Clustering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Motorcycle accidents are more frequent and severe due to complex driving dynamics and the absence of protective bodies, with certain road sections being particularly hazardous, necessitating a method to identify and mitigate these critical areas effectively.

Innovation Solution

A method involving mapping past motorcycle accidents, conducting test drives to record movement data, clustering to identify normal and critical movement patterns, and using discriminant analysis to classify road sections as critical, with real-time warnings provided to motorcyclists approaching hazardous areas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If motorcycle accidents are prevented by increasing safety measures, then accident frequency and severity are reduced, but the complexity of driving dynamics and physics creates errors among inexperienced motorcyclists that cannot be easily mitigated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotorcycle safetyVSAvoiddriving dynamics complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary identification of critical road sections using historical accident data and test drives before actual motorcycle operation. By pre-mapping hazardous areas and storing them in a database, the system prepares safety information in advance, allowing motorcyclists to receive warnings before entering dangerous zones rather than attempting to manage complex driving dynamics in real-time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If critical road sections are identified using detailed test drives and discriminant analysis, then identification reliability is improved, but the time and resources required for data collection and analysis increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecritical road section identification accuracyVSAvoiddata collection and analysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Test drives are conducted in advance to collect motion data and identify critical road sections before actual deployment. The discriminant analysis is performed offline during the identification phase, creating a database of hazardous areas that can then be quickly queried during real-time operation without requiring ongoing complex analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a digital model (copy) of critical road sections based on test drive data and historical accident information. This digital representation stores the results of complex discriminant analysis in a simplified format that can be efficiently compared against actual motorcycle positions during operation, avoiding repeated complex calculations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If continuous monitoring of motorcycle position is implemented to provide real-time warnings, then motorcyclist safety is improved, but the system complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time warning system effectivenessVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and stores the essential safety information (critical road section boundaries and characteristics) into a separate database during the identification phase. During real-time monitoring, the system only needs to compare the motorcycle's current position against this pre-processed data, significantly simplifying the computational requirements compared to performing full discriminant analysis continuously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The database of identified critical road sections acts as an intermediary between the complex discriminant analysis system and the simple real-time position monitoring system. It translates complex analytical results into a format suitable for rapid comparison with actual motorcycle positions, decoupling the complexity of identification from the simplicity of real-time operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3691960B1Method for determination of accidental hotspots for motorised two-wheeled vehicles
Publication Date: 2021.01.06 AIT AUSTRIAN INSTITUTE OF TECNOLOGY GMBH
  • EP3691960B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3691960B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3691960B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A method for determining critical road portions for motorised two-wheeled vehicles (1), in particular motorbikes, wherein a) a map of road portions is made available in which individual past traffic accidents involving motorised two-wheeled vehicles are recorded, b) test journeys are made by means of a motorised two-wheeled vehicle (1) in the road portions that are to be examined, c) a clustering is performed among the determined datasets on the basis of the movement values, and a search is performed for one or more clusters characterising a normal course of movement, said clusters containing the largest possible number of datasets, d) a search is performed by means of discriminant analysis for a function discriminating between critical and non-critical datasets according to the movement values of the datasets, e) further datasets are optionally determined on the basis of further test journeys similarly to step b), and f) those road portions in which datasets or optionally further datasets are provided that have been identified as critical datasets according to the discriminant analysis are identified as critical road portions.