Motorcycle Tire Set With Split Hardness for Stability and Turning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current motorcycle tire sets face challenges in achieving high-speed stability and turning performance, especially in sports category applications for circuit driving.

Innovation Solution

A motorcycle tire set design featuring a front-wheel tire and rear-wheel tire with toroidal carcasses, jointless band plies, and distinct tread rubber hardness and angles, where the front-wheel tire's carcass cords are angled ≤65 degrees and the rear-wheel tire's crown rubber has higher hardness, enhancing steering stability and turning performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the carcass cord angle of the front-wheel tire is reduced to improve steering stability, then steering stability is improved, but high-speed stability performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering stabilityVSAvoidhigh-speed stability performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different carcass cord angles to the front-wheel and rear-wheel tires. The front-wheel tire uses a smaller carcass cord angle (≤65 degrees) optimized for steering stability, while the rear-wheel tire uses a larger carcass cord angle optimized for high-speed stability. This local differentiation allows each tire to be optimized for its specific functional requirements without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If the crown rubber hardness of the rear-wheel tire is increased to improve turning performance, then turning performance is improved, but ride comfort deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveturning performanceVSAvoidride comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent specifies different rubber hardness values for the crown rubber portions of the front-wheel and rear-wheel tires. The rear-wheel tire has a higher crown rubber hardness (Hc2) than the front-wheel tire (Hc1), optimizing the rear tire for turning performance while the front tire maintains lower hardness for ride comfort. This localized material property differentiation resolves the contradiction between turning performance and ride comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Weight of moving object

If jointless band plies are used to reduce weight, then weight is reduced, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetire weightVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates the joints between band plies by using jointless band plies where the band cords extend continuously without interruptions. This removes the joint components and their associated manufacturing complexity while achieving weight reduction. The jointless design simplifies the overall structure by taking out the joint elements that would otherwise be required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12030347B2Motorcycle tire set
Publication Date: 2024.07.09 SUMITOMO RUBBER INDUSTRIES LTD
  • US12030347B2 patent drawing
  • US12030347B2 patent drawing
  • US12030347B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A motorcycle tire set includes a front-wheel tire and a rear-wheel tire. Each of the front and rear-wheel tires includes a carcass, a band layer arranged radially outwardly of the carcass in the tread portion, and a tread rubber arranged radially outwardly of the band layer. The carcass includes a carcass ply including carcass cords. The band layer includes a jointless band ply in which a band cord is circumferentially wound spirally at an angle equal to or less than 5 degrees. The tread rubber includes a crown rubber portion. An angle θ1 of the carcass cords of the front-wheel tire is 65 degrees or more with respect to the tire circumferential direction. A rubber hardness of the crown rubber portion of the rear-wheel tire is greater than a rubber hardness of the crown rubber portion of the front-wheel tire.