Movable Side Deflector for Crosswind Drag Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aerodynamic drag reduction methods for tractor-trailer combinations, such as fixed air deflectors and fairings, are inadequate in crosswind conditions and do not significantly reduce drag when crosswind flow is present, leading to partial drag reduction and inefficiencies in fuel efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A side deflector assembly with movable side deflectors and a control system that senses crosswind direction, allowing the side deflectors to extend outward at a selected angle in crosswind conditions, and deploy into the airstream during braking to increase drag coefficient, thereby reducing aerodynamic drag and improving fuel efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If fixed air deflectors and fairings are used, then aerodynamic drag is reduced in zero crosswind conditions, but drag reduction is insignificant when crosswind flow is present

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic dragVSAvoidperformance in crosswind conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs movable side deflectors that can dynamically adjust their position between retracted and extended states based on detected crosswind conditions. This dynamic configuration allows the system to adapt to varying wind conditions, resolving the contradiction between achieving drag reduction in calm conditions and maintaining effectiveness in crosswind scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates a control system with sensors that detect crosswind conditions and automatically adjust the side deflector positions accordingly. This feedback mechanism ensures the deflectors are positioned optimally for drag reduction whether crosswinds are present or absent, eliminating the performance gap between different wind conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of energy

If side deflectors are extended outwardly in crosswind conditions, then aerodynamic drag is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic dragVSAvoidmovable deflector system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The aerodynamic control system is divided into separate, independently controllable side deflectors on each side of the vehicle. Each deflector can be positioned independently based on crosswind direction and magnitude, allowing the system to achieve complex aerodynamic adjustments through simple, modular components rather than a single complex mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The side deflectors are equipped with automatic control systems that sense crosswind conditions and adjust the deflector positions autonomously without requiring manual intervention. This self-service capability reduces the operational complexity while maintaining the aerodynamic benefits of dynamic adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Force

If side deflectors are deployed into the airstream during braking, then drag coefficient is increased to assist braking, but fuel efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking forceVSAvoidfuel efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The side deflectors are deployed into the airstream temporarily only during braking events rather than remaining in a constant drag-inducing position. This periodic deployment provides additional braking force when needed while minimizing the impact on overall fuel efficiency during normal cruising conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system proactively deploys the side deflectors into the airstream in anticipation of or during braking maneuvers to create aerodynamic drag that assists the braking process. This preliminary anti-action reduces the reliance on mechanical braking systems and improves stopping performance without requiring continuous drag-inducing configurations that would compromise fuel efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces aerodynamic drag in both zero and crosswind conditions, enhancing fuel efficiency and assisting braking by dynamically manipulating the side deflectors in response to wind direction and conditions.

Implementation Method 1

the control system senses the direction of a cross wind relative to the vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCrosswind sensing:

Implementation Method 2

aerodynamic drag of a vehicle having a lead body, a trailing body, and a gap formed therebetween

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic drag: Drag

Data Source

PatentUS8196993B2Drag reducing deflector
Publication Date: 2012.06.12 PACCAR INC
  • US8196993B2 patent drawing
  • US8196993B2 patent drawing
  • US8196993B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more drag reducing deflector systems provide aerodynamic drag reduction during crosswind flow (CF) conditions including zero crosswind flow conditions. Embodiments of the drag reducing deflector system may also be utilized to assist braking of a vehicle.