Movable Track Vehicle Handling for Dense Storage Throughput

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern material handling systems face challenges in efficiently utilizing resources such as space, equipment, and manpower, leading to lower throughput and longer response times as they expand to accommodate a greater number and variety of articles, eventually reaching a point of diminishing returns where further capacity gains become cost-prohibitive.

Innovation Solution

A method and system utilizing a vehicle with both horizontal and vertical drive systems to efficiently navigate and interact with a moveable track, allowing for the horizontal and vertical movement of items within a storage assembly, enabling precise positioning and transfer of items between the vehicle and storage locations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the capacity of existing automation infrastructure is incrementally expanded, then throughput and functionality are improved, but cost and complexity increase to the point of diminishing returns

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidcomplexity of automation infrastructure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into modular components: autonomous vehicles, movable racks, and fixed track segments. Each module can be independently added or removed, allowing capacity expansion without proportionally increasing overall system complexity. Vehicles operate independently on the track network, and racks can be individually repositioned, enabling scalable deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The track infrastructure is made movable through the vehicle-rack interaction mechanism. Vehicles can lift and reposition racks along the track, transforming previously static storage locations into dynamic, reconfigurable positions. This dynamic capability allows the system to adapt to changing throughput requirements without building entirely new infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If the capacity of existing automation infrastructure is incrementally expanded, then functionality is improved, but cost increases to the point of diminishing returns

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovefunctionalityVSAvoidcomplexity of automation infrastructure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The track serves multiple functions: it acts as a guide rail for vehicle movement, a support structure for movable racks, and a transfer mechanism when vehicles lift and reposition racks. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized infrastructure for different operations, improving versatility without proportionally increasing complexity or cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Vehicles autonomously navigate the track network and independently perform rack repositioning operations by lifting and moving racks to desired locations. The system self-manages its own reconfiguration without requiring external intervention or additional complex control infrastructure, enhancing adaptability while keeping the control system manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If resources such as space and equipment are not efficiently utilized, then throughput decreases and response times increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Racks are pre-positioned along the track at strategic locations before needed, and vehicles continuously navigate the track network in readiness. When retrieval or storage operations are required, vehicles can quickly reach the appropriate locations and execute transfers, minimizing response time. The system maintains a ready state without requiring reactive reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system monitors vehicle positions, rack locations, and system state in real-time, dynamically dispatching vehicles to optimize throughput. This feedback mechanism ensures efficient utilization of vehicles and space, preventing idle time and ensuring that response times are minimized by directing resources to where they are most needed at any given moment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11254504B2Material handling system
Publication Date: 2022.02.22 OPEX CORP
  • US11254504B2 patent drawing
  • US11254504B2 patent drawing
  • US11254504B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system may include a vehicle for delivering items and a moveable track that cooperates with the vehicle. The moveable track may cooperate with a storage system having storage locations for storing items. The vehicle may drive into the moveable track and lift the track using a vertical drive mechanism. The vehicle may include a horizontal drive system operable to drive the vehicle horizontally along the ground to carry the moveable track to a position adjacent the storage location. The vehicle may operate the vertical drive system to drop the moveable track adjacent the storage system. Additionally, the vehicle may operate the vertical drive to drive up the moveable track to an elevated position adjacent one of the storage locations in the storage system. The vehicle may include a transfer mechanism for transferring items between the vehicle and the storage location while the vehicle is in the elevated position.