MS Probe Feedback Positioning for Uneven Surface Sampling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Mass spectrometry imaging techniques face challenges in achieving reproducible and quantifiable results on uneven surfaces due to variations in the distance between the mass spectrometry probe and the sample surface, requiring manual adjustments that are time-consuming and prone to human error.

Innovation Solution

An automated feedback control system that uses z-axis sensors, such as conductance sensors, to maintain fluid communication between the liquid microjunction-surface sampling probe and the sample surface by adjusting the probe's position relative to the sample, allowing for precise control of the probe's movement along the x, y, and z axes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual adjustment of probe position is used on uneven surfaces, then sampling can be performed, but reproducibility and quantification are compromised due to varying distances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereproducibility of samplingVSAvoidmanual adjustment requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a feedback control system where a sensor (such as a capacitive or conductive sensor) continuously monitors the distance between the probe tip and the sample surface. The controller receives this distance information and automatically adjusts the probe position to maintain a constant gap, eliminating manual adjustment and ensuring reproducible sampling across uneven surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment with an automated electromechanical system. A motorized positioning mechanism, controlled by a computer or microcontroller, substitutes for human hand movements, providing precise and repeatable probe positioning based on sensor feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If manual adjustment of probe position is performed, then sampling can adapt to uneven surfaces, but time consumption increases and human error occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesampling throughputVSAvoidtime for manual adjustments
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-positioning through automated feedback control. The sensor continuously monitors the probe-sample distance, and the controller automatically makes corrections without human intervention, enabling the system to service itself and eliminate time-consuming manual adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces time-consuming manual mechanical adjustment with rapid automated electromechanical positioning. The motorized system can quickly and precisely adjust probe position in response to sensor feedback, dramatically increasing sampling throughput while eliminating human error.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If constant probe-to-surface distance is maintained, then reproducible results are achieved, but complexity of the system increases due to automation requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantification accuracyVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback control loop where a sensor monitors the probe-sample distance and the controller adjusts positioning accordingly. This automated feedback mechanism ensures constant distance maintenance and reproducible measurements, with the added complexity being justified by the significant improvement in measurement precision and elimination of manual error.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables efficient and reproducible sampling of both biological and non-biological materials with uneven surfaces, reducing human error and increasing sampling throughput by maintaining consistent fluid communication between the probe and the sample, thereby improving the accuracy and efficiency of mass spectrometry imaging.

Implementation Method 1

at least one z-axis sensor that outputs at least one sensor signal corresponding to a sensed z-axis position of a tip of the MS probe relative to the sample material surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConductance: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 2

maintain fluid communication between the liquid microjunction-surface sampling probe and the sample surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid communication:

Data Source

PatentUS20240274426A1Automated Mass Spectrometry Sampling of Material Surfaces
Publication Date: 2024.08.15 QUEENS UNIV
  • US20240274426A1 patent drawing
  • US20240274426A1 patent drawing
  • US20240274426A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A controller for an open port interphase mass spectrometry (MS) probe automates analysis of samples, providing continuous, fast, and reproducible sampling. The sensed position of the probe above the sample surface is used by the controller in a feedback loop to set the probe at the proper position on the sample surface for sampling. One embodiment uses a conductance based sensor signal as input to the feedback loop to determine contact of the probe with the sample surface and to set the probe position according to a selected conductance value. The controller allows fast and automated sampling of uneven sample surfaces with minimal sample preparation while minimizing the risk of clogging the MS probe.