Multi-Axle Vehicle Controller for Independent Wheel Torque Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle stability systems, such as ESC and AFS, are limited in their ability to independently drive and brake multiple axles, particularly in hybrid and electric vehicles, which restricts their capability to apply different driving and braking inputs to wheels, affecting stability and performance.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle with independently driven multiple axles, featuring a controller system that determines target control values for wheel steering, yaw moment, longitudinal force, and wheel speed, and independently drives wheels using in-wheel motors and brakes, allowing for different driving and braking inputs based on operation inputs and driving conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If existing vehicle stability systems (ESC, AFS) are used, then vehicle stability is maintained, but the ability to independently drive and brake multiple axles is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to independently drive and brake multiple axlesVSAvoidvehicle stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle is divided into multiple independently controllable axles, with each axle equipped with its own motor and brake system. This segmentation allows each axle to be controlled independently, enabling different driving and braking inputs to be applied to different wheels, thereby resolving the limitation of existing systems that cannot independently control multiple axles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The vehicle system transitions from a static, unified control approach to a dynamic, multi-axis independent control approach. The controller continuously adjusts the driving and braking forces on each axle based on real-time vehicle state and driver input, allowing the system to adapt to changing conditions while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If different driving and braking inputs are applied to wheels, then driving performance and stability are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving performanceVSAvoidcontroller system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller system is designed to perform multiple functions: it manages motor driving, brake application, steering control, and coordination between different axles. By creating a universal controller that handles all these functions, the system achieves improved driving performance without proportionally increasing complexity, as the same controller infrastructure is used for multiple purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The controller acts as an intermediary between the driver's input and the multiple actuators (motors, brakes, steering systems). It processes the driver's intent and distributes appropriate commands to each axle and wheel, simplifying the overall system architecture by centralizing the coordination logic in a single control unit rather than requiring complex direct connections between all components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If mechanical steering is used, then steering control is simple, but the vehicle cannot turn beyond mechanical limits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering controlVSAvoidturning capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges mechanical steering with independent wheel torque control. The mechanical steering mechanism provides the basic steering function, while the independent torque control on each wheel supplements this by applying differential forces to enable turning beyond the mechanical steering limits. This combination allows the vehicle to maintain simple mechanical steering operation while gaining enhanced turning capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The steering system uses a composite approach, combining mechanical steering components with electromagnetic torque control. Just as composite materials combine different materials to achieve superior properties, this composite steering system combines mechanical and electromagnetic systems to achieve both simplicity of operation and enhanced turning capability beyond mechanical limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS9950703B2Vehicle with independently driven multiple axes, and controller which independently drives multiple axles
Publication Date: 2018.04.24 HANWHA AEROSPACE CO LTD
  • US9950703B2 patent drawing
  • US9950703B2 patent drawing
  • US9950703B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle with independently driven multiple axles and a controller which independently drives the multiple axles are disclosed. The controller includes a first controller which determines a target control value including at least one of a mechanical steering angle of each of a plurality of wheels of a vehicle, a target yaw moment of the vehicle, a target longitudinal force of the vehicle, and a target wheel speed of each of the plurality of wheels; and a second controller which determines wheel torques of the plurality of wheels, which drive the plurality of wheels independently, based on the target control value, wherein the wheel torques of the plurality of wheels are different from one another.