Multi-Blade Charge Port Cover With Compact Translating Retraction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electric vehicle charge port covers are bulky, expensive to manufacture, and aesthetically unpleasing due to their complex design and excessive components, which also makes them more vulnerable when open.

Innovation Solution

A charge port cover arrangement featuring a plurality of charge port blades that move through a combination of translating and transformation movements, facilitated by a single actuation unit and a control assembly that includes a helix rod and gear system, allowing for a more compact and efficient design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional electrically controlled charge port covers are used, then the charge port is protected when not in use, but the design becomes bulky and expensive due to excessive components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharge port protectionVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The charge port cover is divided into multiple individual blades (typically four) that can move independently. Each blade is a separate segment that can be actuated individually or collectively, replacing the conventional single-piece cover design. This segmentation allows for a more compact overall structure while maintaining protective functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The charge port cover transitions from a static conventional design to a dynamic multi-blade system that can change its configuration. The blades can move between closed (protective) and open (access) positions, and can also adopt intermediate states. This dynamic capability is achieved through a simplified actuation mechanism that controls each blade's position independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If conventional electrically controlled charge port covers are used, then the charge port is protected, but the manufacturing cost increases due to excessive components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharge port protectionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the cover into standardised blade segments, each blade can be manufactured independently using identical or similar processes, enabling economies of scale. The modular nature allows for simplified tooling and assembly operations, reducing overall manufacturing complexity and cost despite the multi-component design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple functional elements are merged into integrated components. For example, the actuation mechanism combines rotational and translational movements in a single integrated system, and the blades themselves integrate structural support, protective covering, and aesthetic functions into unified elements, reducing the total number of separate parts that need to be manufactured and assembled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of operation

If conventional charge port covers are opened, then access to charge port is provided, but the cover protrudes outwardly making it bulky and vulnerable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharge port accessVSAvoidcover protrusion
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The blade movement incorporates translational motion in addition to rotation, allowing blades to move not only angularly but also linearly along their hinges. This multi-dimensional movement enables the blades to retract partially or fully into the vehicle body when open, eliminating the conventional protruding appearance and reducing vulnerability while maintaining charge port accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The charge port cover system dynamically adjusts its configuration based on operational requirements. When access is needed, the blades can be partially opened or fully retracted, providing flexible access control. When protection is prioritized, all blades return to their closed position, creating a sleek, non-protruding appearance that enhances aerodynamics and aesthetics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Length of moving object

If multi-dimensional movement of charge port blades is implemented, then compactness is improved, but the actuation mechanism becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecover compactnessVSAvoidactuation mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A single actuation unit performs multiple functions: it simultaneously controls the rotational movement of multiple blades and coordinates their translational retraction. The actuation mechanism is designed to deliver compound motion (rotation plus translation) through an integrated system, eliminating the need for separate actuators for each movement type and reducing overall mechanical complexity despite the multi-dimensional blade trajectories.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution results in a charge port cover that is more compact, less complex, and energy-efficient, while also being aesthetically pleasing and less vulnerable when open, thereby improving manufacturing convenience and overall performance.

Implementation Method 1

The control assembly is configured to move the plurality of blades from one of said states to the other state by a translating movement, and a transformation movement performed at least partly in a sequence, wherein said translating movement is arranged to move the charge port blades in a direction perpendicular to said first plane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScrew mechanism: Screw

Implementation Method 2

The transformation movement moves the charge port blades away from each other, or towards each other until they form a common circle that covers the charge port of the vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGear mechanism: Gear

Data Source

PatentEP4541627A1A charge port cover arrangement
Publication Date: 2025.04.23 POLESTAR PERFORMANCE
  • EP4541627A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4541627A1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP4541627A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a charge port cover arrangement (1) comprising a control assembly (10) comprising an actuation unit (11), and a plurality of charge port blades (2a, 2b, 2c, 2d). The charge port cover arrangement (1) is arranged to alternate between a closed state in which said charge port blades (2a, 2b, 2c, 2d) form a common perimeter coincident with a first plane (p1), wherein the plurality of charge port blades (2a, 2b, 2c, 2d) are arranged to jointly cover a charge port opening of said vehicle, and an open state in which said charge port blades (2a, 2b, 2c, 2d) are arranged to expose said charge port opening of said vehicle to an environment. The control assembly (10) is configured to, in response to actuation of said actuation unit (11) move the plurality of blades (2a, 2b, 2c, 2d) from one of said states to the other state by a translating movement, and a transformation movement performed at least partly in a sequence.