Multi-Charged Particle Beam Writing Apparatus Defect Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multi-beam writing apparatuses face challenges with defective beams due to structural complexity, leading to reduced writing accuracy and increased resource requirements, as maintaining high accuracy with existing redundancy methods necessitates excessive hardware and software resources.

Innovation Solution

A multi-charged particle beam writing apparatus that detects defective beams and adjusts by reconfiguring the aperture member to utilize remaining beams efficiently, allowing for continued writing with minimal resource increase by shifting beam positions and controlling beam states to compensate for defective beams.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If redundancy method is used to maintain writing accuracy by preparing many more beams, then writing accuracy is maintained, but device complexity and resource requirements increase excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewriting accuracyVSAvoidhardware and software resource requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the number of beams to be used based on detected defective beams. The control unit determines the actual number of functional beams and adjusts writing parameters accordingly, transforming a static redundant beam system into a dynamic adaptive system that maintains accuracy without excessive resources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the parameter of beam quantity from a fixed predetermined number to a dynamically determined number based on actual beam functionality. By detecting defective beams and adjusting the effective beam count, the system adapts parameters to maintain writing accuracy while optimizing resource usage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If multiple beams are used for writing to increase throughput, then productivity is improved, but the likelihood of defective beams increases due to structural complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewriting throughputVSAvoidbeam functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by detecting defective beams before writing operations and using this information to adjust the number of beams to be used. The detection unit provides feedback on beam functionality, and the control unit responds by determining the actual number of functional beams, creating a closed-loop system that maintains reliability while preserving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection of defective beams before the actual writing process. By identifying and accounting for non-functional beams in advance, the system prepares the optimal number of beams to use, ensuring both high productivity and reliability without during the writing operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If the number of beams is increased to compensate for defective beams, then writing accuracy is maintained, but loss of time for detecting and measuring increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewriting accuracyVSAvoidbeam detection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and removes defective beams from the operational set by detecting them and adjusting the number of beams to be used. This extraction process eliminates the need to account for defective beams during writing, reducing the complexity and time of beam management while maintaining writing accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach maintains writing accuracy without increasing the number of beams, enabling efficient writing operations even with defective beams, thus reducing resource demands and improving throughput.

Implementation Method 1

an emission unit that emits a charged particle beam; an aperture member in which a plurality of openings are formed, and configured to form multiple beams by letting a first region including a whole of the plurality of openings be irradiated by the charged particle beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCharged particle beam transmission: Electron Beam

Implementation Method 2

a plurality of blankers that respectively perform blanking deflection of a corresponding beam in multiple beams having passed through the plurality of openings of the aperture member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBeam deflection: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentUS9076564B2Multi charged particle beam writing apparatus and multi charged particle beam writing method
Publication Date: 2015.07.07 NUFLARE TECH INC
  • US9076564B2 patent drawing
  • US9076564B2 patent drawing
  • US9076564B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi charged particle beam writing apparatus according to an embodiment, includes a setting unit to set a second region such that more openings in remaining openings except for an opening through which the defective beam passes are included in the second region, a selection unit to select a mode from a first mode in which a pattern is written on a target object by using multiple beams having passed openings in the second region and a second mode in which multiple writing is performed while shifting a position by using at least one of remaining multiple beams in the state where the defective beam is controlled to be beam off and additional writing is performed for a position which was supposed to be written by the defective beam, and a writing processing control unit to control to write in the mode selected.